Zenner L, Bon G, Chauve C, Nemoz C, Lubac S
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon & Université de Lyon - CNRS UMR 5558, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, 1 avenue Bourgelat, 69280, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2009 Jun;48(1-2):157-66. doi: 10.1007/s10493-009-9253-3. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
Various methods for monitoring Dermanyssus gallinae infestations within free-range egg production units were compared. The study was carried out in five egg-producing free-range poultry buildings infested with D. gallinae. Each farm was divided into six zones (each zone including nest boxes, perches and duckboard) for placing two types of traps (corrugated cardboard and thick card traps) or examining dried droppings for presence of mites. Traps were removed 24 h later, placed into bags and mites were counted at the laboratory using binocular magnification. Droppings were also inspected by eye and mite numbers were estimated. All the methods used allowed us to detect mites although their efficacy differed. The number of mites collected was independent of the type of trap used. Examination of the droppings did not differentiate between buildings with differing mite populations. Placing traps in the nest boxes is a less reliable indicator than placing them on the perches. It appears that the most coherent method for evaluating the D. gallinae population within a free-range flock is to place thick card traps throughout the building, on perches favoured by birds.
对监测散养蛋鸡生产单元中鸡皮刺螨侵扰的各种方法进行了比较。该研究在五个感染鸡皮刺螨的散养蛋鸡舍中进行。每个农场被划分为六个区域(每个区域包括产蛋箱、栖木和垫板),用于放置两种类型的诱捕器(波纹纸板诱捕器和厚纸板诱捕器)或检查干粪便中是否存在螨虫。24小时后取出诱捕器,放入袋中,并在实验室使用双目放大镜对螨虫进行计数。粪便也通过肉眼检查并估算螨虫数量。尽管所使用的所有方法的功效不同,但都能让我们检测到螨虫。收集到的螨虫数量与所使用的诱捕器类型无关。检查粪便无法区分螨虫数量不同的鸡舍。将诱捕器放置在产蛋箱中作为指标不如放置在栖木上可靠。看来,评估散养鸡群中鸡皮刺螨数量最一致的方法是在整个鸡舍内鸟类喜欢栖息的栖木上放置厚纸板诱捕器。