Tantivess Sripen
International Health Policy Program, Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S88-99.
The processes of policy development and implementation in the public sector are complex and dynamic as several actors with different interests are involved. To pursue their benefits, these individual and organizational participants compete with each other and those with a relatively high degree of power can lead the policy decisions. Results of and recommendations derived from economic evaluation and other forms ofhealth technology assessment (HTA) are expected to have an important role in policy making and professional practice. However, it appears that on many occasions, such scientific evidence is neglected. Complex calculations, arbitrary assumptions, debatable choices of whose perspectives to pursue, difficult-to-understand methods, research designs and underlying philosophy/concepts, and time-consuming processes are claimed as key factors discouraging policy makers and practitioners from making use of HTA findings. Ethical considerations and the perception that HTA-based clinical guidelines undermine professional autonomy are also crucial.
公共部门的政策制定和实施过程复杂且动态多变,因为涉及多个利益不同的行为主体。为追求自身利益,这些个体和组织参与者相互竞争,权力相对较大的参与者能够主导政策决策。经济评估及其他形式的卫生技术评估(HTA)的结果和建议,有望在政策制定和专业实践中发挥重要作用。然而,在许多情况下,此类科学证据似乎被忽视了。复杂的计算、随意的假设、在应采纳谁的观点上存在争议的选择、难以理解的方法、研究设计及基本理念/概念,以及耗时的过程,都被认为是阻碍政策制定者和从业者利用HTA结果的关键因素。伦理考量以及基于HTA的临床指南会损害专业自主性的看法,也至关重要。