Lertpitakpong Chanida, Chaikledkaew Usa, Thavorncharoensap Montarat, Tantivess Sripen, Praditsitthikorn Naiyana, Youngkong Sitaporn, Yothasamut Jomkwan, Udomsuk Kanchanart, Sinthitichai Kongkoch, Teerawattananon Yot
Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S100-9.
This study is to describe experiences and findings from the topic selection process for health technology assessment (HTA) conducted by Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program. The process comprised of 5 stages namely: (1) determining objectives, scope and involved stakeholders; (2) requesting potential topics for assessment from decision makers at the national health authorities; (3) reviewing related literature on and prioritizing the proposed HTA topics by HITAP researchers; (4) selecting the HTA topics by decisionmakers; (5) analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the current topic selection processes by HITAP staff The strengths of the topic selection were systematic and transparent. It also required participation from stakeholders; however the limitations were topics prioritization methods and time constraints. Lessons learnt from this procedure can be useful for improving the next HTA topic selection in order to increase the usefulness of the future HTA results.
本研究旨在描述健康干预与技术评估项目开展的卫生技术评估(HTA)选题过程中的经验和发现。该过程包括5个阶段,即:(1)确定目标、范围和相关利益者;(2)向国家卫生当局的决策者征集潜在评估主题;(3)HITAP研究人员审查相关文献并对提议的HTA主题进行优先级排序;(4)决策者选择HTA主题;(5)HITAP工作人员分析当前选题过程的优缺点。选题的优点是系统且透明,还需要利益相关者的参与;然而,局限性在于主题优先级排序方法和时间限制。从该程序中学到的经验教训有助于改进下一次HTA选题,以提高未来HTA结果的实用性。