Dashow Jason E, Lewis Charlotte W, Hopper Richard A, Gruss Joseph S, Egbert Mark A
University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Mar;46(2):173-8. doi: 10.1597/07-136.1. Epub 2008 May 30.
To determine whether placement of a bupivacaine-soaked absorbable sponge (BAS) in addition to bupivacaine infiltration at the anterior iliac crest (AIC) donor site alters postoperative pain for children undergoing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL+/-P). The comparison group received only bupivacaine infiltration (NO BAS) at the AIC.
Retrospective cohort. Medical records were abstracted by one investigator, blinded to BAS versus NO BAS use.
Consecutive patients with CL+/-P who underwent ABG between 2000 and 2006 at one large U.S. craniofacial center.
BAS was used in 118 procedures and NO BAS in 89.
Postoperative pain score, total and opioid pain medication requirement, length of hospital stay (LOS), and time to initial ambulation.
One hundred eighty-two patients underwent 207 ABG procedures. Mean pain scores were significantly lower when BAS was used compared with NO BAS (1.3 versus 1.8; p = .01). Patients who received BAS required significantly less pain medication than NO BAS patients: opioids (0.14 versus 0.20 mg/kg; p = .01) and total (0.60 versus 0.71 mg/kg; p = .02). Relative to the NO BAS group, those who received BAS had a shorter LOS (30.9 versus 42.4 hours; p < .0001) and less time to initial ambulation following surgery (14.4 versus 20.6 hours; p < .0001).
Use of BAS at the AIC donor site significantly reduced postoperative pain score, pain medication requirement, LOS, and time to ambulation relative to children who did not receive BAS following ABG.
确定在唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(CL+/-P)患儿行牙槽骨植骨术(ABG)时,在前髂嵴(AIC)供区除布比卡因浸润外放置布比卡因浸泡的可吸收海绵(BAS)是否会改变术后疼痛情况。对照组仅在AIC处进行布比卡因浸润(无BAS)。
回顾性队列研究。由一名对BAS与无BAS使用情况不知情的研究者提取病历。
2000年至2006年期间在美国一家大型颅面中心接受ABG的连续CL+/-P患者。
118例手术使用了BAS,89例未使用BAS。
术后疼痛评分、总的和阿片类止痛药物需求量、住院时间(LOS)以及首次下床活动时间。
182例患者接受了207例ABG手术。与无BAS相比,使用BAS时平均疼痛评分显著更低(1.3对1.8;p = 0.01)。接受BAS的患者所需止痛药物明显少于无BAS患者:阿片类药物(0.14对0.20 mg/kg;p = 0.01)和总的(0.60对0.71 mg/kg;p = 0.02)。与无BAS组相比,接受BAS的患者住院时间更短(30.9对42.4小时;p < 0.0001),术后首次下床活动时间更少(14.4对20.6小时;p < 0.0001)。
与ABG术后未接受BAS的儿童相比,在AIC供区使用BAS显著降低了术后疼痛评分、止痛药物需求量、住院时间和下床活动时间。