Smith Alastair D
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):231-9. doi: 10.1037/a0014184.
Drawing tasks have attained a central position in neuropsychological assessment and are considered a rich source of information about the presence (or absence) of cognitive and perceptuo-motor abilities. However, unlike other tests of cognitive impairment, drawing tasks are often administered without reference to normative models of graphic production, and their results are often analyzed qualitatively. I begin this article by delineating the different ways in which drawing errors have been used to indicate particular functional deficits in neurological patients. I then describe models of drawing that have been explicitly based on the errors observed in patient drawings. Finally, the case is made for developing a more sensitive set of metrics in order to quantitatively assess patient performance. By providing a finer grain of analysis to assessment we will not only be better able to characterize the consequences of cognitive dysfunction, but may also be able to more subtly characterize and dissociate patients who would otherwise have been placed in the same broad category of impairment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
绘画任务在神经心理学评估中占据核心地位,被视为有关认知和感知运动能力存在(或不存在)的丰富信息来源。然而,与其他认知障碍测试不同,绘画任务在实施时往往不参照图形制作的规范模型,其结果也常常进行定性分析。本文开篇先阐述绘画错误被用于指示神经疾病患者特定功能缺陷的不同方式。接着,我将描述明确基于患者绘画中观察到的错误而建立的绘画模型。最后,提出应开发一套更灵敏的指标以便对患者表现进行定量评估。通过为评估提供更细致的分析,我们不仅能更好地描述认知功能障碍的后果,还可能更精准地描述和区分那些原本会被归为同一宽泛损伤类别的患者。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2009 美国心理学会,保留所有权利)