Suppr超能文献

溃疡型软组织肉瘤。恶性溃疡的治疗意义及预后重要性。

Fungating soft-tissue sarcomas. Treatment implications and prognostic importance of malignant ulceration.

作者信息

Potter Benjamin K, Adams Sheila C, Qadir Rabah, Pitcher J David, Temple H Thomas

机构信息

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):567-74. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00071.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several variables have been reported as being prognostic with regard to the outcomes of soft-tissue sarcomas. Although the tumors are subjectively ominous, no prior study has been performed to evaluate the treatment or prognosis of fungating soft-tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all soft-tissue sarcomas treated at our institution between 1989 and 2004 that had been followed for a minimum of two years or until the death of the patient. Our study group consisted of twenty-four patients with a primary high-grade fungating tumor, and our control group consisted of 146 consecutive patients with a primary high-grade non-fungating tumor. The study cohorts were compared with regard to disease presentation, treatment, and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in tumor size, tumor depth, or histopathologic diagnoses between the cohorts, although the patients with a fungating tumor tended to be older (mean, sixty-five years compared with fifty-five years in the control group; p = 0.004) and have shorter postoperative follow-up (mean, thirty-eight months compared with sixty-five months in the control group; p = 0.03). The proportion of patients presenting with metastases was significantly greater in the group with a fungating tumor (33% compared with 9% in the control group; p = 0.003). Significantly more patients with a fungating tumor underwent amputation (35% compared with 12% in the control group; p = 0.01), while a greater proportion of control patients received radiation therapy (68% compared with 39% in the group with a fungating tumor; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the proportions of patients receiving chemotherapy or in the local recurrence rates between the two cohorts. The Kaplan-Meier five-year overall survival estimates were 20% in the group with a fungating tumor compared with 63% (p < 0.0001) in the control group. The Kaplan-Meier five-year disease-specific survival estimates for patients presenting with localized disease was 58% in the group with a fungating tumor and 74% in the control group (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that disease stage, fungation, and a tumor size of > or = 10 cm were significant independent negative prognostic factors for disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant tumor ulceration is an independent predictor of a poor prognosis for patients with a high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. Despite the discouraging overall prognosis, aggressive multidisciplinary treatment can lead to long-term survival in an important subgroup of patients with fungating lesions.

摘要

背景

已有多项变量被报道与软组织肉瘤的预后相关。尽管这些肿瘤主观上预后不佳,但此前尚未有研究评估溃疡性软组织肉瘤的治疗或预后情况。

方法

我们对1989年至2004年间在本机构接受治疗且随访至少两年或直至患者死亡的所有软组织肉瘤进行了回顾性研究。我们的研究组由24例原发性高级别溃疡性肿瘤患者组成,对照组由146例连续的原发性高级别非溃疡性肿瘤患者组成。对研究队列在疾病表现、治疗和肿瘤学结局方面进行了比较。

结果

两组在肿瘤大小、肿瘤深度或组织病理学诊断方面无显著差异,不过溃疡性肿瘤患者往往年龄较大(平均65岁,对照组为55岁;p = 0.004),术后随访时间较短(平均38个月,对照组为65个月;p = 0.03)。溃疡性肿瘤组出现转移的患者比例显著更高(33%,对照组为9%;p = 0.003)。溃疡性肿瘤患者接受截肢的比例显著更高(35%,对照组为12%;p = 0.01),而对照组接受放疗的患者比例更高(68%,溃疡性肿瘤组为39%;p = 0.02)。两组在接受化疗的患者比例或局部复发率方面无差异。Kaplan-Meier法估计的五年总生存率在溃疡性肿瘤组为20%,对照组为63%(p < 0.0001)。对于局限性疾病患者,Kaplan-Meier法估计的五年疾病特异性生存率在溃疡性肿瘤组为58%,对照组为74%(p = 0.05)。多变量分析表明,疾病分期、溃疡形成以及肿瘤大小≥10 cm是疾病特异性生存的显著独立负性预后因素。

结论

恶性肿瘤溃疡是高级别软组织肉瘤患者预后不良的独立预测因素。尽管总体预后令人沮丧,但积极的多学科治疗可使溃疡性病变患者的一个重要亚组实现长期生存。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验