Song Jin Woo, Do Kyung-Hyun, Kim Mi-Young, Jang Se Jin, Colby Thomas V, Kim Dong Soon
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chest. 2009 Jul;136(1):23-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2572. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
Patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) associated with collagen vascular disease (CVD) have been reported to have a better prognosis than those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with a UIP pattern (IPF/UIP) seen on histology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathologic and radiologic differences between the two conditions and their relationship with clinical outcome.
A retrospective review of 100 patients (CVD-UIP, 39 patients; IPF/UIP, 61 patients) with UIP pattern diagnosed by surgical lung biopsy at one tertiary referral center.
The median follow-up period was 34.4 months. The CVD-UIP group was younger, included more women and nonsmokers, and showed better survival than the IPF/UIP group. Pathologically, CVD-UIP patients had fewer fibroblastic foci and smaller honeycombing (HC) spaces with higher germinal centers and total inflammation scores than IPF/UIP patients. Radiologically, CVD-UIP patients had a lower emphysema score and more likely a nontypical UIP pattern without HC. The germinal centers score was the best distinguishing feature between CVD-UIP and IPF/UIP patients (odds ratio, 2.948; p = 0.001) and was marginally related to survival (p = 0.076). The HC score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.134; p < 0.001), total lung capacity (TLC) [HR, 0.932; p = 0.004], and age (HR, 1.052; p = 0.017) were significant predictors of survival in all patients with UIP histology, regardless of the presence of CVD. Among IPF/UIP patients, those with positive autoantibodies were pathologically more similar to CVD-UIP than to IPF/UIP without autoantibodies, despite no difference in survival between them.
The germinal centers score was the best discriminative between CVD-UIP and IPF/UIP patients; it was of marginal prognostic significance. Age, TLC, and HC score were independent prognostic factors in all patients with UIP histology.
据报道,与胶原血管病(CVD)相关的普通型间质性肺炎(UIP)患者的预后比组织学上表现为UIP型的特发性肺纤维化(IPF/UIP)患者更好。本研究的目的是评估这两种情况之间的病理和放射学差异及其与临床结局的关系。
对一家三级转诊中心通过外科肺活检诊断为UIP型的100例患者(CVD-UIP组39例;IPF/UIP组61例)进行回顾性研究。
中位随访期为34.4个月。CVD-UIP组患者更年轻,女性和非吸烟者更多,且生存率高于IPF/UIP组。病理上,CVD-UIP患者的成纤维细胞灶较少,蜂窝状(HC)间隙较小,生发中心和总炎症评分高于IPF/UIP患者。放射学上,CVD-UIP患者的肺气肿评分较低,更可能表现为无HC的非典型UIP型。生发中心评分是区分CVD-UIP和IPF/UIP患者的最佳特征(优势比,2.948;p = 0.001),与生存率有边缘相关性(p = 0.076)。HC评分(风险比[HR],1.134;p < 0.001)、肺总量(TLC)[HR,0.932;p = 0.004]和年龄(HR,1.052;p = 0.017)是所有UIP组织学患者生存的显著预测因素,无论是否存在CVD。在IPF/UIP患者中,自身抗体阳性者在病理上与CVD-UIP比与无自身抗体的IPF/UIP更相似,尽管他们之间的生存率无差异。
生发中心评分是区分CVD-UIP和IPF/UIP患者的最佳指标;具有边缘预后意义。年龄、TLC和HC评分是所有UIP组织学患者的独立预后因素。