Feddock Christopher A, Hoellein Andrew R, Griffith Charles H, Wilson John F, Lineberry Michelle J, Haist Steven A
Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Mar;163(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.559.
To determine the effect of a medical school adolescent medicine workshop on knowledge and clinical skills using standardized patients.
Randomized controlled trial.
The University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
A total of 186 third-year medical students. Intervention Medical students assigned to the intervention group (n = 95) participated in a 4-hour adolescent medicine workshop using standardized patients to practice interviewing and counseling skills. Medical students assigned to the control group (n = 91) participated in an alternative workshop.
Medical student adolescent interviewing and counseling skills were assessed using adolescent standardized patient encounters during the end-of-clerkship examination and during the end of the third-year Clinical Performance Examination. Medical student knowledge was assessed at the end of the clerkship using an open-ended postencounter written exercise and the questions specific to adolescent medicine on the clerkship written examination.
Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Medical students in the intervention group scored significantly higher on both measures of clinical skills, the standardized patient stations during the end-of-clerkship examination and the Clinical Performance Examination. Intervention medical students also scored significantly higher on both measures of knowledge, the open-ended postencounter written exercise and the written examination.
A brief adolescent medicine workshop using standardized patients improved medical students' knowledge and skills at the end of a 4-week clerkship, and the improvement in clinical skills persisted at the end of the third year of medical school.
通过标准化病人确定医学院青少年医学工作坊对知识和临床技能的影响。
随机对照试验。
肯塔基大学医学院,列克星敦。
总共186名三年级医学生。干预措施:分配到干预组的医学生(n = 95)参加了一个4小时的青少年医学工作坊,使用标准化病人练习问诊和咨询技巧。分配到对照组的医学生(n = 91)参加了另一个工作坊。
在实习期末检查和三年级临床技能考试结束时,通过青少年标准化病人问诊评估医学生的青少年问诊和咨询技巧。在实习期末,通过开放式问诊后书面练习以及实习书面考试中青少年医学特定问题评估医学生的知识。
两组具有可比的基线特征。干预组医学生在临床技能的两项评估中得分显著更高,即实习期末检查中的标准化病人站和临床技能考试。干预组医学生在知识的两项评估中得分也显著更高,即开放式问诊后书面练习和书面考试。
在为期4周的实习结束时,使用标准化病人的简短青少年医学工作坊提高了医学生的知识和技能,并且临床技能的提高在医学院三年级末仍然持续。