Cerfolio Robert James, Bryant Ayesha S, Canon Cheri L, Dhawan Roopa, Eloubeidi Mohamad A
Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;137(3):565-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.049.
The optimal management of the pylorus during esophagogastrectomy is unknown. Pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty cause early edema and risk long-term bile reflux; however, the lack of pyloric drainage might risk early aspiration.
We performed a retrospective study with a prospective database on patients with esophageal cancer or high-grade dysplasia who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy. All had one surgeon and similar stomach tubularization, hand-sewn anastomoses, nasogastric tube duration, and postoperative prokinetic agents. Outcomes of postoperative gastric emptying, aspiration, and swallowing symptoms were compared.
Between January 1997 and June 2008, there were 221 patients. Seventy-one patients had a pyloromyotomy, and gastric emptying judged on postoperative day 4 was delayed in 93% (52% had any morbidity and 14% had respiratory morbidity). Fifty-four patients had no drainage procedure, and gastric emptying was delayed in 96% (59% had any morbidity and 22% had respiratory morbidity). Twenty-eight patients underwent pyloroplasty, and 96% had delayed gastric emptying (50% had any morbidity and 32% had respiratory morbidity). Sixty-eight patients had botulinum toxin injection into the pylorus. Gastric emptying was delayed in only 59% (P = .002, 44% had any morbidity and 13% had respiratory morbidity). Hospital length of stay (P = .015) and operative times (P = .037) were shorter in the botulinum toxin group. Follow-up (mean, 40 months) showed symptoms of biliary reflux to be lowest in the botulinum toxin group (P = .024).
Injection of the pylorus with botulinum toxin at the time of esophagogastrectomy is safe and decreases operative time when compared with pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. In addition, it can improve early gastric emptying, decrease respiratory complications, shorten hospital stay, and reduce late bile reflux. A prospective multi-institutional randomized trial is needed.
食管癌切除术中幽门的最佳处理方式尚不清楚。幽门肌切开术和幽门成形术会导致早期水肿,并存在长期胆汁反流的风险;然而,缺乏幽门引流可能会增加早期误吸的风险。
我们对接受艾弗-刘易斯食管癌切除术的食管癌或高级别异型增生患者的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性研究。所有患者均由同一外科医生进行手术,胃管状化、手工缝合吻合、鼻胃管留置时间和术后促动力药物使用情况相似。比较术后胃排空、误吸和吞咽症状的结果。
1997年1月至2008年6月期间,共有221例患者。71例患者接受了幽门肌切开术,术后第4天判断胃排空延迟的比例为93%(52%有任何并发症,14%有呼吸系统并发症)。54例患者未进行引流手术,胃排空延迟的比例为96%(59%有任何并发症,22%有呼吸系统并发症)。28例患者接受了幽门成形术,96%有胃排空延迟(50%有任何并发症,32%有呼吸系统并发症)。68例患者接受了幽门肉毒素注射。胃排空延迟的比例仅为59%(P = 0.002,44%有任何并发症,13%有呼吸系统并发症)。肉毒素组的住院时间(P = 0.015)和手术时间(P = 0.037)较短。随访(平均40个月)显示,肉毒素组胆汁反流症状最低(P = 0.024)。
与幽门成形术或幽门肌切开术相比,食管癌切除术中向幽门注射肉毒素是安全的,且可缩短手术时间。此外,它可以改善早期胃排空,减少呼吸系统并发症,缩短住院时间,并减少晚期胆汁反流。需要进行一项前瞻性多机构随机试验。