Suppr超能文献

非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在非工作时间就诊时具有更高的风险特征,且治疗不够积极,但他们的预后并不更差:来自“不稳定型心绞痛患者快速风险分层能否通过早期实施ACC/AHA指南抑制不良结局(CRUSADE)倡议”的一份报告。

Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who present during off hours have higher risk profiles and are treated less aggressively, but their outcomes are not worse: a report from Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines CRUSADE initiative.

作者信息

Pollack Charles V, Hollander Judd E, Chen Anita Y, Peterson Eric D, Bangalore Sripal, Peacock Frank W, Cannon Christopher P, Canto John G, Gibler Brian W, Ohman Magnus E, Roe Matthew T

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009 Mar;8(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181980f9f.

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines call for advanced and definitive therapy for patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). It is not known whether these guidelines are follow more diligently when patients arrive in the ED during regular hours, during which hospital resources including cardiology consultation may be more readily available. To determine whether patients with NSTEMI who present to the ED outside of usual hours have prolonged times to advanced and definitive therapy and poorer short-term outcomes.We examined NSTEMI patients from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) national quality improvement initiative (January 2001-April 2003) and compared demographics, risk profiles, intensity of medical management, and timing and intensity of intervention by whether presentation occurred during usual or off hours. We analyzed 34,297 NSTEMI presentations; 15,090 (44%) occurred during usual hours; 19,207 (56%) occurred during off hours. Off-hours-presenting patients had generally higher cardiac risk and received initial ECGs more quickly than patients who presented during usual hours (median 15 minutes vs. 18 minutes, P < 0.0001), and received similar (although suboptimal) medical management. In contrast, those who presented during off hours were less likely to receive timely diagnostic angiography, PCI, and bypass surgery (cath: median 32.9 hours vs. 24.3 hours, P < 0.0001; PCI: 28.6 hours vs. 23.6 hours, P < 0.0001). Despite these differences, in-hospital outcomes were similar. Time of patient presentation has a modest impact on the timeliness of intervention in NSTEMI but was not associated with lower mortality. Although intensity of medical management was similar between groups, it was generally lower than current guidelines recommend, indicating potential for improvement in NSTEMI outcomes, regardless of time of presentation.

摘要

循证指南要求对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行高级和确定性治疗。尚不清楚当患者在正常工作时间到达急诊科时,这些指南是否会得到更严格的遵循,在此期间包括心脏病学会诊在内的医院资源可能更容易获得。为了确定在非工作时间到急诊科就诊的NSTEMI患者是否接受高级和确定性治疗的时间延长且短期预后较差。我们研究了来自“通过早期实施ACC/AHA指南快速对不稳定型心绞痛患者进行风险分层以抑制不良结局(CRUSADE)”全国质量改进计划(2001年1月至2003年4月)的NSTEMI患者,并比较了患者的人口统计学、风险特征、医疗管理强度以及根据就诊时间是在正常工作时间还是非工作时间进行干预的时间和强度。我们分析了34297例NSTEMI就诊病例;其中15090例(44%)在正常工作时间就诊;19207例(56%)在非工作时间就诊。非工作时间就诊的患者通常心脏风险更高,且比正常工作时间就诊的患者更快接受初始心电图检查(中位数15分钟对18分钟,P<0.0001),并接受了类似的(尽管并不理想)医疗管理。相比之下,非工作时间就诊的患者接受及时诊断性血管造影、PCI和搭桥手术的可能性较小(血管造影:中位数32.9小时对24.3小时,P<0.0001;PCI:28.6小时对23.6小时,P<0.0001)。尽管存在这些差异,但住院结局相似。患者就诊时间对NSTEMI干预的及时性有适度影响,但与较低死亡率无关。尽管两组之间的医疗管理强度相似,但总体上低于当前指南的建议,这表明无论就诊时间如何,NSTEMI结局都有改善的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验