Kohro Takahide, Yamazaki Tsutomu
Department of Translational Research for Healthcare and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2009 Feb;32(2):109-14. doi: 10.1038/hr.2008.26. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
Recently, results of several cardiovascular clinical trials conducted in Japan were published. Most of them were designed as prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point (PROBE)-type trials, in which patients were randomly allocated to different regimens and both the patients and doctors are aware of the regimen being administered. Although the PROBE design enables performing trials resembling real-world practices, entails low costs and renders patient recruitment easier, it presents several conditions that have to be satisfied to acquire accurate results, due to its open-label nature. Principally, the so-called hard end points, which are judged by objective criteria, should be used as primary end points in order to prevent biases. In this article, a general description of various designs of clinical studies is provided, followed by a description of the PROBE design, and the precautions to be taken while conducting PROBE-designed trials by comparing trials conducted in Japan and the West.
最近,在日本进行的几项心血管临床试验结果已发表。其中大多数设计为前瞻性随机开放标签盲终点(PROBE)型试验,即患者被随机分配到不同治疗方案,且患者和医生都知晓所给予的治疗方案。尽管PROBE设计能够开展类似真实临床实践的试验,成本低且患者招募更容易,但由于其开放标签的性质,要获得准确结果还需满足几个条件。原则上,为防止偏差,应由客观标准判断的所谓硬终点应作为主要终点。本文首先对临床研究的各种设计进行概述,接着描述PROBE设计,并通过比较在日本和西方进行的试验,阐述开展PROBE设计试验时应注意的事项。