Leisnham Paul T, Juliano S A
Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2315, USA.
Oecologia. 2009 May;160(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1305-1. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Understanding mechanisms fostering coexistence between invasive and resident species is important in predicting ecological, economic, or health impacts of invasive species. The mosquito Aedes aegypti coexists at some urban sites in southeastern United States with invasive Aedes albopictus, which is often superior in interspecific competition. We tested predictions for three hypotheses of species coexistence: seasonal condition-specific competition, aggregation among individual water-filled containers, and colonization-competition tradeoff across spatially partitioned habitat patches (cemeteries) that have high densities of containers. We measured spatial and temporal patterns of abundance for both species among water-filled resident cemetery vases and experimentally positioned standard cemetery vases and ovitraps in metropolitan Tampa, Florida. Consistent with the seasonal condition-specific competition hypothesis, abundances of both species in resident and standard cemetery vases were higher early in the wet season (June) versus late in the wet season (September), but the proportional increase of A. albopictus was greater than that of A. aegypti, presumably due to higher dry-season egg mortality and strong wet-season competitive superiority of larval A. albopictus. Spatial partitioning was not evident among cemeteries, a result inconsistent with the colonization-competition tradeoff hypothesis, but both species were highly independently aggregated among standard cemetery vases and ovitraps, which is consistent with the aggregation hypothesis. Densities of A. aegypti but not A. albopictus differed among land use categories, with A. aegypti more abundant in ovitraps in residential areas compared to industrial and commercial areas. Spatial partitioning among land use types probably results from effects of land use on conditions in both terrestrial and aquatic-container environments. These results suggest that both temporal and spatial variation may contribute to local coexistence between these Aedes in urban areas.
了解促进入侵物种与本地物种共存的机制对于预测入侵物种对生态、经济或健康的影响至关重要。埃及伊蚊在美国东南部的一些城市地区与入侵的白纹伊蚊共存,而白纹伊蚊在种间竞争中通常更具优势。我们测试了物种共存的三个假设的预测:特定季节条件下的竞争、单个盛水容器之间的聚集,以及跨越空间分隔的栖息地斑块(墓地)的定殖 - 竞争权衡,这些斑块中有高密度的容器。我们测量了佛罗里达州坦帕市大都会地区居民墓地花瓶以及实验放置的标准墓地花瓶和诱卵器中两种蚊子的丰度的时空模式。与特定季节条件下的竞争假设一致,居民墓地花瓶和标准墓地花瓶中两种蚊子的丰度在雨季早期(6月)高于雨季晚期(9月),但白纹伊蚊的比例增加大于埃及伊蚊,这可能是由于旱季卵死亡率较高以及白纹伊蚊幼虫在雨季具有较强的竞争优势。在墓地之间没有明显的空间分隔,这一结果与定殖 - 竞争权衡假设不一致,但两种蚊子在标准墓地花瓶和诱卵器中都高度独立聚集,这与聚集假设一致。埃及伊蚊的密度在不同土地利用类别中存在差异,而白纹伊蚊则没有,与工业和商业区相比,埃及伊蚊在居民区的诱卵器中更为丰富。土地利用类型之间的空间分隔可能是由于土地利用对陆地和水生容器环境条件的影响。这些结果表明,时间和空间变化都可能有助于这些伊蚊在城市地区的局部共存。