Lesprit Philippe, Duong Trung, Girou Emmanuelle, Hemery François, Brun-Buisson Christian
Unité de Contrôle, Epidémiologie et Prévention de l'Infection, Université Paris 12, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 May;63(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp062. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
The aim of this study was to measure the impact on antibiotic use of a computer-generated alert prompting post-prescription review and direct counselling in hospital wards.
A computer-generated alert on new prescriptions of 15 antibiotics was reviewed weekly by an infectious disease physician for 41 weeks. During the first 6 months of the study, criteria selected for potential intervention were: (i) a planned duration of treatment of > or =10 days; (ii) discordance between the spectrum of the prescribed antibiotic and available microbiological results; or (iii) prescriptions of broad-spectrum beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides or linezolid. During the following 5 months, the alert was restricted to any prescription of the 15 antibiotics in the 9 wards where overall antibiotic use had not decreased in the past year.
We analysed 2385 prescriptions, 932 (39%) of which generated an alert for potential intervention. Among the latter, 482 (51.7%) prescriptions prompted direct counselling, mainly for shortening the planned duration of therapy (18.9%), withdrawing antibiotics (16.2%) or streamlining therapy (15.5%). The attending physicians' compliance with the recommendations was 80%. The overall median (interquartile range) days of therapy prescribed by the attending physicians was reduced from an initial duration of 8 (7-14) to 7 (6-11) days (P < 0.0001), resulting in 26.5% less antibiotic days prescribed. The time required for the intervention was 6 h per week.
This computer-prompted post-prescription review led physicians to modify one half of the antibiotic courses initially prescribed and was well accepted by the majority, although they had not requested counselling.
本研究旨在衡量医院病房中计算机生成的提示处方后审查和直接咨询对抗生素使用的影响。
一名传染病医生每周对15种抗生素新处方的计算机生成提示进行41周的审查。在研究的前6个月,选择的潜在干预标准为:(i)计划治疗持续时间≥10天;(ii)处方抗生素的抗菌谱与可用微生物学结果不一致;或(iii)广谱β-内酰胺类、氟喹诺酮类、糖肽类或利奈唑胺的处方。在接下来的5个月中,提示仅限于过去一年中总体抗生素使用未减少的9个病房中15种抗生素的任何处方。
我们分析了2385张处方,其中932张(39%)产生了潜在干预提示。在后者中,482张(51.7%)处方引发了直接咨询,主要是为了缩短计划治疗持续时间(18.9%)、停用抗生素(16.2%)或简化治疗(15.5%)。主治医生对建议的依从性为80%。主治医生开出的治疗天数总体中位数(四分位间距)从最初的8(7 - 14)天降至7(6 - 11)天(P < 0.0001),抗生素使用天数减少了26.5%。干预所需时间为每周6小时。
这种计算机提示的处方后审查使医生修改了最初开出的一半抗生素疗程,并且尽管他们没有要求咨询,但大多数医生都欣然接受。