Unité de Contrôle, Epidémiologie et Prévention de l'Infection, Université Paris 12, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Apr;65(4):789-95. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq018. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
Encouraging reassessment of intravenous antibiotic therapy at days 3-4 is an important step in the management of patients and may be done by delivering a questionnaire or through systematic infectious disease physician (IDP) advice to prescribers.
In this before-and-after study, prescriptions of 13 selected intravenous antibiotics from surgical or medical wards were screened from a computer-generated listing and prospectively included. Three strategies were compared over three consecutive 8 week periods: conventional management by the attending physician (control group); distribution of a questionnaire to the physician (questionnaire group); or distribution of the questionnaire followed by IDP advice (Q-IDP group). The primary outcome was the percentage of modifications of antibiotic therapy at day 4, including withdrawal of therapy, de-escalation, oral switch or reducing the planned duration of therapy.
Overall, 402 prescriptions were included. At day 4, 48.9% and 54.5% of prescriptions were modified in the control and questionnaire groups, respectively (P = 0.35). In contrast, more prescriptions (66.2%) were modified in the Q-IDP group as compared with the control group (P = 0.004). Stopping therapy in the absence of apparent bacterial infection occurred significantly more often in the Q-IDP group than in the control (P < 0.0001) or questionnaire groups (P = 0.002).
This study shows a modest impact of only distributing a questionnaire aimed at reminding physicians to reassess therapy, whereas systematic IDP intervention improves the modification rate.
鼓励在第 3-4 天重新评估静脉用抗生素治疗是患者管理的重要步骤,可通过提供问卷或通过系统的传染病医师(IDP)建议向开具处方的医生来完成。
在这项前后对照研究中,从计算机生成的清单中筛选出来自外科或内科病房的 13 种选定的静脉用抗生素处方,并进行前瞻性纳入。在三个连续的 8 周期间比较了三种策略:主治医生的常规管理(对照组);向医生发放问卷(问卷组);或发放问卷后再由 IDP 提供建议(Q-IDP 组)。主要结局是第 4 天抗生素治疗修改的百分比,包括停止治疗、降级、口服转换或缩短计划治疗时间。
总体而言,纳入了 402 份处方。在第 4 天,对照组和问卷组分别有 48.9%和 54.5%的处方被修改(P=0.35)。相比之下,Q-IDP 组有更多的处方(66.2%)被修改,与对照组相比(P=0.004)。在 Q-IDP 组中,在没有明显细菌感染的情况下停止治疗的情况明显多于对照组(P<0.0001)或问卷组(P=0.002)。
本研究表明,仅发放旨在提醒医生重新评估治疗的问卷的影响有限,而系统的 IDP 干预可提高修改率。