• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进知识发现:专利与市场

Promoting intellectual discovery: patents versus markets.

作者信息

Meloso Debrah, Copic Jernej, Bossaerts Peter

机构信息

Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1335-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1158624.

DOI:10.1126/science.1158624
PMID:19265019
Abstract

Because they provide exclusive property rights, patents are generally considered to be an effective way to promote intellectual discovery. Here, we propose a different compensation scheme, in which everyone holds shares in the components of potential discoveries and can trade those shares in an anonymous market. In it, incentives to invent are indirect, through changes in share prices. In a series of experiments, we used the knapsack problem (in which participants have to determine the most valuable subset of objects that can fit in a knapsack of fixed volume) as a typical representation of intellectual discovery problems. We found that our "markets system" performed better than the patent system.

摘要

由于专利提供了排他性的产权,它们通常被认为是促进知识发现的有效方式。在此,我们提出一种不同的补偿方案,即每个人持有潜在发现的组成部分的股份,并可以在一个匿名市场中交易这些股份。在该方案中,发明的激励是间接的,通过股价的变化来实现。在一系列实验中,我们将背包问题(参与者必须确定能够装入固定容量背包的最有价值的物品子集)作为知识发现问题的典型代表。我们发现我们的“市场系统”比专利系统表现得更好。

相似文献

1
Promoting intellectual discovery: patents versus markets.促进知识发现:专利与市场
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1335-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1158624.
2
The economics of ideas and intellectual property.思想与知识产权的经济学
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 25;102(4):1252-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407730102. Epub 2005 Jan 18.
3
Can you shrinkwrap a cow? Protections available for the intellectual property of the animal breeding industry.你能给一头牛包上收缩膜吗?动物育种行业知识产权的可用保护措施。
Anim Genet. 2007 Dec;38(6):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01656.x.
4
Subsidies versus intellectual property rights when innovators operate in two markets.当创新者在两个市场运营时,补贴与知识产权的权衡。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284880. eCollection 2023.
5
Review: intellectual property aspects of plant transformation.综述:植物转化的知识产权方面
Plant Biotechnol J. 2005 Jul;3(4):371-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00142.x.
6
New wine in old bottles? The biotechnology problem in the history of molecular biology.旧瓶装新酒?分子生物学史上的生物技术问题。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009 Mar;40(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
7
How Humans Solve Complex Problems: The Case of the Knapsack Problem.人类如何解决复杂问题:以背包问题为例。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 7;6:34851. doi: 10.1038/srep34851.
8
Introduction to intellectual property rights for investigators in health research and institutional intellectual property policy.健康研究人员的知识产权介绍及机构知识产权政策
Acta Trop. 2009 Nov;112 Suppl 1:S80-3. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
9
The impact of intellectual property rights on health care in Canada.知识产权对加拿大医疗保健的影响。
Health Law Can. 2008 Jun;28(3-4):89-101.
10
Patent holdings of US biotherapeutic companies in major markets.美国生物治疗公司在主要市场的专利持有情况。
Drug Discov Today. 2009 May;14(9-10):442-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating self-performance when making complex decisions.在做出复杂决策时评估自我表现。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87601-8.
2
Not so smart? "Smart" drugs increase the level but decrease the quality of cognitive effort.不够聪明?“聪明”药物会提高认知努力的水平,但降低其质量。
Sci Adv. 2023 Jun 16;9(24):eadd4165. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add4165. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
'If I had a hedge fund, I would cure diabetes': endogenous mechanisms for creating public goods.“如果我有一个对冲基金,我就能治愈糖尿病”:创造公共产品的内生机制。
SN Bus Econ. 2021;1(10):120. doi: 10.1007/s43546-021-00115-z. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Uncertainty and computational complexity.不确定性和计算复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 18;374(1766):20180138. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0138.
5
How Humans Solve Complex Problems: The Case of the Knapsack Problem.人类如何解决复杂问题:以背包问题为例。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 7;6:34851. doi: 10.1038/srep34851.
6
Volcano-related materials in concretes: a comprehensive review.混凝土中与火山有关的材料:全面综述
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Apr;23(8):7220-43. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6161-z. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
New approaches to rewarding pharmaceutical innovation.奖励制药创新的新方法。
CMAJ. 2011 Apr 5;183(6):681-5. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100375. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
8
An experiment on prediction markets in science.科学中预测市场的实验。
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 30;4(12):e8500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008500.