De Leon-Rodriguez Luis M, Lubag Angelo Josue M, Malloy Craig R, Martinez Gary V, Gillies Robert J, Sherry A Dean
Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA.
Acc Chem Res. 2009 Jul 21;42(7):948-57. doi: 10.1021/ar800237f.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has inherent advantages in safety, three-dimensional output, and clinical relevance when compared with optical and radiotracer imaging methods. However, MRI contrast agents are inherently less sensitive than agents used in other imaging modalities primarily because MRI agents are detected indirectly by changes in either the water proton relaxation rates (T(1), T(2), and T(*)(2)) or water proton intensities (chemical exchange saturation transfer and paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer, CEST and PARACEST). Consequently, the detection limit of an MRI agent is determined by the characteristics of the background water signal; by contrast, optical and radiotracer-based methods permit direct detection of the agent itself. By virtue of responding to background water (which reflects bulk cell properties), however, MRI contrast agents have considerable advantages in "metabolic" imaging, that is, spatially resolving tissue variations in pH, redox state, oxygenation, or metabolite levels. In this Account, we begin by examining sensitivity limits in targeted contrast agents and then address contrast agents that respond to a physiological change; these responsive agents are effective metabolic imaging sensors. The sensitivity requirements for a metabolic imaging agent are quite different from those for a targeted Gd(3+)-based T(1) agent (for example, sensing cell receptors). Targeted Gd(3+) agents must have either an extraordinarily high water proton relaxivity (r(1)) or multiple Gd(3+) complexes clustered together at the target site on a polymer platform or nanoparticle assembly. Metabolic MRI agents differ in that the high relaxivity requirement, although helpful, is eased because these agents respond to bulk properties of tissues rather than low concentrations of a specific biological target. For optimal sensing, metabolic imaging agents should display a large change in relaxivity (deltar(1)) in response to the physiological or metabolic parameter of interest. Metabolic imaging agents have only recently begun to appear in the literature and only a few have been demonstrated in vivo. MRI maps of absolute tissue pH have been obtained with Gd(3+)-based T(1) sensors. The requirement of an independent measure of agent concentration in tissues complicates these experiments, but if qualitative changes in tissue pH are acceptable, then these agents can be quite useful. In this review, we describe examples of imaging extracellular pH in brain tumors, ischemic hearts, and pancreatic islets with Gd(3+)-based pH sensors and discuss the potential of CEST and PARACEST agents as metabolic imaging sensors.
与光学成像和放射性示踪剂成像方法相比,磁共振成像(MRI)在安全性、三维输出及临床相关性方面具有内在优势。然而,MRI造影剂本质上比其他成像方式中使用的造影剂灵敏度更低,主要原因是MRI造影剂是通过水质子弛豫率(T(1)、T(2)和T(*)(2))或水质子强度(化学交换饱和转移和顺磁化学交换饱和转移,即CEST和PARACEST)的变化间接检测的。因此,MRI造影剂的检测限由背景水信号的特性决定;相比之下,基于光学和放射性示踪剂的方法允许直接检测造影剂本身。然而,由于对背景水(反映细胞整体特性)有响应,MRI造影剂在“代谢”成像方面具有显著优势,即能够在空间上分辨组织在pH值、氧化还原状态、氧合或代谢物水平方面的变化。在本综述中,我们首先研究靶向造影剂的灵敏度极限,然后讨论对生理变化有响应的造影剂;这些响应性造影剂是有效的代谢成像传感器。代谢成像造影剂的灵敏度要求与基于钆(Gd(3+))的靶向T(1)造影剂(例如,用于检测细胞受体)的要求有很大不同。靶向Gd(3+)造影剂必须具有极高的水质子弛豫率(r(1)),或者多个Gd(3+)络合物在聚合物平台或纳米颗粒组装体的靶位点聚集在一起。代谢MRI造影剂的不同之处在于,虽然高弛豫率要求有帮助,但有所放宽,因为这些造影剂对组织的整体特性有响应,而不是对特定生物靶点的低浓度有响应。为了实现最佳检测,代谢成像造影剂应在响应感兴趣的生理或代谢参数时显示出弛豫率的大幅变化(deltar(1))。代谢成像造影剂直到最近才开始出现在文献中,并且只有少数在体内得到了验证。使用基于Gd(3+)的T(1)传感器已获得了绝对组织pH值的MRI图谱。在组织中需要独立测量造影剂浓度使这些实验变得复杂,但如果组织pH值的定性变化是可以接受的,那么这些造影剂会非常有用。在本综述中,我们描述了使用基于Gd(3+)的pH传感器对脑肿瘤、缺血心脏和胰岛细胞外pH值进行成像的例子,并讨论了CEST和PARACEST造影剂作为代谢成像传感器的潜力。