• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肿瘤患者的永久性中心静脉导管]

[Permanent central venous catheters in oncologic patients].

作者信息

Schrøder M, Pedersen I R, Rasmussen R B

机构信息

Kirurgisk afdeling, Finseninstitutet, Rigshospitalet, København.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Sep 2;153(36):2491-4.

PMID:1926604
Abstract

Permanent central venous catheters play an important role in the treatment of patients with malignancies. Two systems are available, Hickman-Broviac Catheters (HB) and Port-a-Cath (PAC), the latter is fully implantable. Since 1982, the systems have been used in the Finsen Institute. In the period 01.01.1984 to 31.03.1988 a total of 232 HB and 52 PAC were inserted in 245 patients with solid malignant tumours with one exception. All the catheters were inserted with the venous cut-down technique and at the end of the period mainly in local analgesia. The total indwelling time was 36,859 days, mean 99 days (1-616 days) for HB and 92 days (8-519 days) for PAC. Seventeen catheters remained in place for more than 365 days. A total of 114 complications concerning 88 catheters were registered. The most serious complications were sepsis and thrombosis. The frequency of sepsis was low, 0.06 (HB) and 0.01 (PAC) per 100 catheter-days. The corresponding frequency of thrombosis was 0.03/100 catheter-days for both systems. Sixty-one HB and five PAC had to be removed because of complications. In general, the complication rate was lower for the PAC method. In addition, the nursing care was reduced to a minimum. The surgical cut-down method is preferable, as catheter implantation is possible even in patients with disorders of the coagulation system.

摘要

永久性中心静脉导管在恶性肿瘤患者的治疗中发挥着重要作用。有两种系统可供选择,即希克曼-布罗维亚克导管(HB)和植入式静脉输液港(PAC),后者是完全可植入的。自1982年以来,这些系统一直在芬森研究所使用。在1984年1月1日至1988年3月31日期间,245例实体恶性肿瘤患者共插入了232根HB导管和52根PAC导管,只有1例例外。所有导管均采用静脉切开技术插入,在该时期结束时主要采用局部镇痛。总留置时间为36859天,HB导管平均99天(1 - 616天),PAC导管平均92天(8 - 519天)。17根导管留置时间超过365天。共记录了涉及88根导管的114例并发症。最严重的并发症是败血症和血栓形成。败血症的发生率较低,HB导管每100导管日为0.06,PAC导管每100导管日为0.01。两种系统血栓形成的相应发生率均为0.03/100导管日。由于并发症,61根HB导管和5根PAC导管不得不被拔除。总体而言,PAC方法的并发症发生率较低。此外,护理工作减少到了最低限度。手术切开方法更可取,因为即使是凝血系统有障碍的患者也可以进行导管植入。

相似文献

1
[Permanent central venous catheters in oncologic patients].[肿瘤患者的永久性中心静脉导管]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Sep 2;153(36):2491-4.
2
Prolonged venous access in cancer patients.癌症患者的长期静脉通路
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989 Dec;15(6):553-5.
3
[Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].[可植入导管系统。1000例中心静脉端口患者的经验]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1996 Jan 19;121(3):47-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1042970.
4
[Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].[完全植入式静脉通路系统。并发症分析]
Minerva Chir. 1997 Jul-Aug;52(7-8):937-42.
5
A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy.实体瘤化疗患者中 Hickman 导管和植入式静脉输液港相关并发症的比较
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007 Sep;19(7):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 22.
6
Central venous catheters for chemotherapy of solid tumors--our results in the last 5 years.实体肿瘤化疗用中心静脉导管——我们过去5年的结果
Coll Antropol. 2008 Sep;32(3):767-70.
7
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管。持续静脉通路的低风险替代方案。
West J Med. 1994 Jan;160(1):25-30.
8
[Use of the Broviac/Hickman catheter in pediatric oncology].
Klin Padiatr. 1988 Jan-Feb;200(1):49-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033685.
9
[Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].[血液学患者隧道式中心静脉导管的感染性和非感染性并发症]
Sangre (Barc). 1999 Jun;44(3):176-81.
10
Use of Broviac/Hickman catheter for long-term venous access in pediatric cancer patients.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):143-8.