Won Sungho, Morris Nathan, Lu Qing, Elston Robert C
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, MA, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2009 May 15;28(11):1537-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.3569.
Fisher (1925) was the first to suggest a method of combining the p-values obtained from several statistics and many other methods have been proposed since then. However, there is no agreement about what is the best method. Motivated by a situation that now often arises in genetic epidemiology, we consider the problem when it is possible to define a simple alternative hypothesis of interest for which the expected effect size of each test statistic is known and we determine the most powerful test for this simple alternative hypothesis. Based on the proposed method, we show that information about the effect sizes can be used to obtain the best weights for Liptak's method of combining p-values. We present extensive simulation results comparing methods of combining p-values and illustrate for a real example in genetic epidemiology how information about effect sizes can be deduced.
费希尔(1925年)首次提出了一种合并从多个统计量获得的p值的方法,从那时起又提出了许多其他方法。然而,对于哪种方法是最佳方法并没有达成共识。受遗传流行病学中经常出现的一种情况的启发,我们考虑在可以定义一个感兴趣的简单备择假设的情况下的问题,对于该假设,每个检验统计量的预期效应大小是已知的,并且我们确定针对这个简单备择假设的最具功效的检验。基于所提出的方法,我们表明效应大小的信息可用于获得利普塔克合并p值方法的最佳权重。我们给出了广泛的模拟结果来比较合并p值的方法,并举例说明了在遗传流行病学的一个实际例子中如何推导出效应大小的信息。