Bollen Kenneth A, Lennox Richard D, Dahly Darren L
Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, CB 3210 Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210, USA.
Stat Med. 2009 May 1;28(10):1524-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.3560.
Researchers are often faced with the task of trying to measure abstract concepts. The most common approach is to use multiple indicators that reflect an underlying latent variable. However, this 'effect indicator' measurement model is not always appropriate; sometimes the indicators instead cause the construct of interest. While the notion of 'causal indicators' has been known for some time, it is still too often ignored. However, there are limited means to determine whether a possible indicator should be treated as a cause or an effect of the latent construct of interest. Perhaps the best empirical way is to use the vanishing tetrad test (VTT), yet this method is still often overlooked. We speculate that one reason for this is the lack of published examples of its use in practice, written for an audience without extensive statistical training. The goal of this paper was to help fill this gap in the literature-to provide a basic example of how to use the VTT. We illustrated the VTT by looking at multiple items from a health related quality of life instrument that seem more likely to cause the latent variable rather than the other way around.
研究人员常常面临试图测量抽象概念的任务。最常见的方法是使用多个反映潜在潜变量的指标。然而,这种“效果指标”测量模型并不总是合适的;有时这些指标反而导致了感兴趣的构念。虽然“因果指标”的概念已经存在了一段时间,但它仍然经常被忽视。然而,确定一个可能的指标应被视为感兴趣的潜在构念的原因还是结果的方法有限。也许最好的实证方法是使用消失四元组检验(VTT),但这种方法仍然经常被忽视。我们推测其原因之一是缺乏为没有广泛统计训练的读者撰写的关于其在实践中使用的已发表示例。本文的目的是帮助填补文献中的这一空白——提供一个如何使用VTT的基本示例。我们通过查看一份与健康相关的生活质量量表中的多个项目来说明VTT,这些项目似乎更有可能导致潜在变量,而不是相反。