Beyhaghi Hadi, Reeve Bryce B, Rodgers Jo E, Stearns Sally C
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
To evaluate the reliability and factorial validity of the four-item Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale (MGLS) among Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study participants.
We used the cross-sectional visit 5 data from the ARIC Study to assess the measurement properties of the MGLS. We measured the internal consistency using Cronbach α (where α > 0.70 is considered reliable for group-level measurement), the response frequency, and the inter item correlation. Factor analysis of the MGLS and five other adherence items in the survey was conducted using a polychoric correlation matrix to examine the dimensionality that underlies the MGLS. A vanishing tetrad test was conducted to assess conformity with an effect indicator model.
Among the ARIC visit 5 participants, 6,261 (96%) responded to the MGLS and other questions related to medication adherence in the survey (mean age 76 ± 5 years, 59% women). The Cronbach α for the MGLS was 0.47. The inter-item correlations ranged from 0.11 to 0.26. In the factor analysis of the medication adherence survey questions, a three-factor solution was used. One factor captured the extent of nonadherence, whereas other factors focused on the reasons for nonadherence. The MGLS items spread out across the factors that reflect the extent of as well as the reasons for nonadherence. The results of the vanishing tetrad test indicated that the MGLS consists of items other than effect indicators (P < 0.0001).
The low reliability together with the factor analysis findings imply that the MGLS may reflect causes as well as the extent of medication adherence. The findings suggest that the MGLS, as presently used, lacks consistency in an elderly population.
评估四项版的莫尔斯基-格林-莱文药物依从性量表(MGLS)在社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)参与者中的信度和因子效度。
我们使用ARIC研究的横断面访视5数据来评估MGLS的测量属性。我们使用克朗巴哈α系数测量内部一致性(其中α>0.70被认为对于组水平测量是可靠的)、反应频率和项目间相关性。使用多相相关矩阵对MGLS以及调查中的其他五个依从性项目进行因子分析,以检验MGLS潜在的维度。进行消失四分体检验以评估与效应指标模型的符合性。
在ARIC访视5的参与者中,6261名(96%)对MGLS以及调查中其他与药物依从性相关的问题做出了回应(平均年龄76±5岁,59%为女性)。MGLS的克朗巴哈α系数为0.47。项目间相关性范围为0.11至0.26。在药物依从性调查问题的因子分析中,采用了三因子解决方案。一个因子反映不依从的程度,而其他因子关注不依从的原因。MGLS项目分布在反映不依从程度和原因的因子中。消失四分体检验结果表明,MGLS由效应指标以外的项目组成(P<0.0001)。
低信度以及因子分析结果表明,MGLS可能反映了药物依从性的原因以及程度。研究结果表明,目前使用的MGLS在老年人群中缺乏一致性。