• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年决策能力的发展:心理学和神经学视角及其对少年被告的影响。

The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants.

作者信息

Kambam Praveen, Thompson Christopher

机构信息

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles Semel/Neuropsychiatric Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, C8-222, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):173-90. doi: 10.1002/bsl.859.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.859
PMID:19266591
Abstract

The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents has been a topic of interest for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. Questions regarding the development of decision-making capacities (and moral reasoning) of youth frequently arise in juvenile justice settings, other forensic settings, and sometimes in treatment settings. This article attempts to review the latest and most relevant research on the development of decision-making capacities likely to be relevant in children and adolescents who are defendants. We distinguish cognition versus judgment in decision-making and briefly review adolescent decision-making in laboratory and real world conditions. We review a theoretical framework of two different systems, a cognitive-control system and socio-emotional system, and potentially correlated neurobiological and psychological findings. Implications for selected aspects of the juvenile adjudicative process are discussed.

摘要

儿童和青少年决策能力的发展一直是数百年来(即便不是数千年来)人们感兴趣的话题。关于青少年决策能力(以及道德推理)发展的问题经常出现在青少年司法环境、其他法医环境中,有时也出现在治疗环境中。本文试图回顾有关决策能力发展的最新且最相关的研究,这些研究可能与作为被告的儿童和青少年相关。我们区分了决策中的认知与判断,并简要回顾了实验室和现实世界条件下的青少年决策。我们回顾了一个由认知控制系统和社会情感系统这两种不同系统构成的理论框架,以及潜在相关的神经生物学和心理学研究结果。还讨论了对青少年裁决过程某些方面的影响。

相似文献

1
The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants.儿童和青少年决策能力的发展:心理学和神经学视角及其对少年被告的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):173-90. doi: 10.1002/bsl.859.
2
Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney-juvenile client relationship.作为被告参与的有效性:律师与青少年客户的关系。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(2):175-98. doi: 10.1002/bsl.532.
3
Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: age differences and delinquency.弥补判断文献成熟度方面的差距:年龄差异与犯罪行为
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Feb;32(1):78-91. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9087-7. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
4
(Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults.青春期判断力的(不)成熟:为何青少年的罪责可能轻于成年人。
Behav Sci Law. 2000;18(6):741-60. doi: 10.1002/bsl.416.
5
Toward a conceptual framework of instrumental antisocial decision-making and behavior in youth.迈向青少年工具性反社会决策与行为的概念框架。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Jun;27(5):655-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
6
The impact of juveniles' ages and levels of psychosocial maturity on judges' opinions about adjudicative competence.青少年的年龄和心理成熟度水平对法官关于裁判能力的意见的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Feb;36(1):21-7. doi: 10.1037/h0093953.
7
Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention.将问题行为的预防与青少年积极发展相联系:青少年积极发展和风险预防的核心能力。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2008 Winter;2008(122):1-17. doi: 10.1002/cd.225.
8
Juvenile psychopathy and judicial decision making: an empirical analysis of an ethical dilemma.青少年精神病态与司法决策:对一个伦理困境的实证分析
Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(2):151-65. doi: 10.1002/bsl.792.
9
Neuroscience, moral reasoning, and the law.神经科学、道德推理与法律。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):219-36. doi: 10.1002/bsl.854.
10
Predictors of involvement in the juvenile justice system among psychiatric hospitalized adolescents.精神科住院青少年中参与少年司法系统的预测因素。
Addict Behav. 2008 Jul;33(7):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
African American mothers talk to their preadolescents about honesty and lying.非裔美国母亲与她们的青春期前孩子谈论诚实和撒谎。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2021 Jul;27(3):521-530. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000396. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Adolescent Brain Development and Progressive Legal Responsibility in the Latin American Context.拉丁美洲背景下的青少年大脑发育与逐步承担法律责任
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 24;11:627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00627. eCollection 2020.
3
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Recidivism in Serious Juvenile Offenders: Testing the Mediating Role of Future Orientation.
严重少年犯的创伤后应激症状与再犯:检验未来取向的中介作用
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2018 Nov 9;13(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s40653-018-0234-8. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Applying the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges' Resolution to Juvenile Probation Reform.将少年及家庭法院法官全国委员会的决议应用于少年缓刑改革。
Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;5(2):170-181. doi: 10.1037/tps0000192.
5
Pathways to delinquency and substance use among African American youth: Does future orientation mediate the effects of peer norms and parental monitoring?非裔美国青年犯罪和物质使用的途径:未来取向是否会调节同伴规范和父母监管的影响?
J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(6):840-852. doi: 10.1177/1359105317736912. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.