Rohlmann A, Zander T, Rao M, Bergmann G
Julius Wolff Institut, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, PSF 24, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
J Biomech. 2009 May 11;42(7):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Different modes of load applications are used to simulate flexion and extension of the upper body. It is not clear which loading modes deliver realistic results and allow the comparison of different studies. In a numerical study, a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine, ranging from the vertebra L1 to the disc L5-S1 was employed. Each of six different loading modes was studied for simulating flexion and extension, including pure moments, an eccentric axial force, using a wedged fixture, and applying upper body weight plus follower load plus muscle forces. Intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressures and facet joint contact forces were calculated. Where possible, results were compared to data measured in vivo. The results of the loading modes studied show a large variance for some values. Outcome measures such as flexion angle and intradiscal pressure differed at a segment by up to 44% and 88%, respectively, related to their maximum values. Intradiscal pressure is mainly determined by the magnitude of the applied compressive force. For flexion maximum contact forces between 0 and 69 N are predicted in each facet joint for different loading modes. For both flexion and extension, applying upper body weight plus follower load plus muscle forces as well as a follower load together with a bending moment delivers results which agreed well with in vivo data from the literature. Choosing an adequate loading mode is important in spine biomechanics when realistic results are required for intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressure and facet joint contact forces. Only then will results of different studies be comparable.
使用不同的加载方式来模拟上半身的屈伸。目前尚不清楚哪种加载方式能得出实际结果并允许不同研究之间进行比较。在一项数值研究中,采用了一个经验证的腰椎有限元模型,范围从L1椎体到L5-S1椎间盘。研究了六种不同加载方式中的每一种来模拟屈伸,包括纯力矩、偏心轴向力、使用楔形夹具以及施加上半身重量加随动载荷加肌肉力。计算了节段间旋转、椎间盘内压力和小关节接触力。在可能的情况下,将结果与体内测量数据进行比较。所研究的加载方式结果显示,某些值存在很大差异。诸如屈曲角度和椎间盘内压力等结果指标在不同节段分别与其最大值相差高达44%和88%。椎间盘内压力主要由施加的压缩力大小决定。对于屈曲,不同加载方式下每个小关节预测的最大接触力在0至69 N之间。对于屈伸,施加上半身重量加随动载荷加肌肉力以及随动载荷与弯矩一起能得出与文献中的体内数据吻合良好的结果。当需要节段间旋转、椎间盘内压力和小关节接触力的实际结果时,在脊柱生物力学中选择合适的加载方式很重要。只有这样,不同研究的结果才具有可比性。