• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎前路/腰骶融合术的内外反应:非线性有限元分析

Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.

作者信息

Guan Yabo, Yoganandan Narayan, Maiman Dennis J, Pintar Frank A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):299-304. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812e6276.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812e6276
PMID:18525492
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Determination of external and internal responses of the human lumbosacral spine using a validated 3-dimensional finite element model.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the range of motion, disc stress, and facet joint pressure owing to anterior fusion at L4-L5 or L5-S1 level and compare with the intact spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A significant majority of finite element models of anterior lumbar interbody fusion are primarily focused on upper and middle levels, whereas lower spinal levels are most commonly treated with surgery.

METHODS

A 3-dimensional L4-S1 finite element model, validated in the entire nonlinear range of the moment-rotation response, was used to determine ranges of motion, disc stress, and facet joint contact pressure under normal and 2 surgical conditions with bone graft and porous tantalum. Biomechanical responses were compared under flexion and extension loading between the 2 fusions and fusion masses and at the fused and intact segments.

RESULTS

Moment-rotation responses were nonlinear under all conditions. The range of motion at the caudal level was greater than the range of motion at the rostral level in the intact spine. The range of motion of the L4-S1 spine decreased more with the caudal than rostral fusion and more with the tantulum than bone under both loading modes. Facet joint pressures increased more with the rostral than caudal fusion. Stresses in the adjacent disc were greater with the caudal than rostral fusion under both modes of loading.

CONCLUSIONS

At the fused level, the caudal fusion imparted additional rigidity under flexion to the lumbosacral joint. Both fusion masses added flexibility to the adjacent segment. Under both fusion masses, increased facet joint pressure in the lumbosacral joint indicates the susceptibility of this transitional joint to long-term biomechanics-induced consequences. Increased facet joint pressures with the rostral fusion indicate that the posterior complex responds with increased load sharing, and may predispose the spine to facet-related arthropathy. Increased stresses in the adjacent disc with the caudal fusion under both modes of loading imply the potential to disc-related changes owing to long-term physiologic loading.

摘要

研究设计

使用经过验证的三维有限元模型确定人体腰骶椎的外部和内部反应。

目的

本研究的目的是评估L4-L5或L5-S1水平前路融合术后的活动范围、椎间盘应力和小关节压力,并与完整脊柱进行比较。

背景数据总结

绝大多数腰椎前路椎间融合术的有限元模型主要集中在上段和中段,而下段脊柱是最常见的手术治疗部位。

方法

采用一个在力矩-旋转反应的整个非线性范围内经过验证的三维L4-S1有限元模型,来确定正常和两种手术情况下(使用骨移植和多孔钽)的活动范围、椎间盘应力和小关节接触压力。比较了两种融合方式及融合块在屈伸载荷下以及融合节段和完整节段之间的生物力学反应。

结果

在所有情况下,力矩-旋转反应均为非线性。完整脊柱中尾侧节段的活动范围大于头侧节段。在两种加载模式下,L4-S1脊柱的活动范围在尾侧融合时比头侧融合减少得更多,使用钽时比使用骨时减少得更多。小关节压力在头侧融合时比尾侧融合增加得更多。在两种加载模式下,相邻椎间盘的应力在尾侧融合时比头侧融合更大。

结论

在融合节段,尾侧融合在屈曲时给腰骶关节增加了额外的刚度。两种融合块都增加了相邻节段的灵活性。在两种融合块情况下,腰骶关节小关节压力增加表明该过渡关节易受长期生物力学诱导后果的影响。头侧融合时小关节压力增加表明后复合体通过增加负荷分担做出反应,可能使脊柱易患与小关节相关的关节病。在两种加载模式下,尾侧融合时相邻椎间盘应力增加意味着长期生理负荷可能导致与椎间盘相关的变化。

相似文献

1
Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.腰椎前路/腰骶融合术的内外反应:非线性有限元分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):299-304. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812e6276.
2
Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.两级Charité人工椎间盘置入与融合加单级椎间盘置入组合的生物力学比较。
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
3
Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.腰椎全椎间盘置换中约束的生物力学效应:一项有限元分析研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1281-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4ec2d.
4
Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.腰椎融合术导致骶髂关节角度运动和应力增加:一项有限元研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 1;34(5):E162-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ea3.
5
Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.两级Maverick椎间盘置换与一级混合椎间盘置换及一级前路腰椎椎间融合术的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 May 28.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.全椎间盘置换人工关节的生物力学评估:体外人体尸体模型
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S110-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092209.27573.90.
7
Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine with anterior interbody fusion on the different locations of the bone grafts.不同植骨位置前路椎体间融合术治疗腰椎的生物力学分析
Biomed Mater Eng. 2002;12(4):367-74.
8
Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.腰椎全椎间盘置换术、椎间盘切除术和融合术的生物力学比较:对相邻节段椎间盘压力和小关节力的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):507-14. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11250. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.全椎间盘置换定位会影响小关节接触力和椎体应变。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):2510-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318186b258.
10
In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.腰椎全椎间盘置换术后Prodisc-L假体组件的原位接触分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):E716-23. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ae23d1.

引用本文的文献

1
Vertebropexy as a semi-rigid ligamentous alternative to lumbar spinal fusion.椎体骨水泥固定术作为腰椎融合术的半刚性韧带替代方法。
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1695-1703. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07647-y. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Does pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration affect outcomes after isolated L4-5 fusion for spondylolisthesis?既往存在的L5-S1退变是否会影响腰椎滑脱症单纯L4-5融合术后的疗效?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Mar 26;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0186-8.
3
Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
腰椎前路融合术后低等级峡部裂性脊柱滑脱症相邻节段 10 年的变化。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1845-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3256-4.
4
Radiographic progression of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion.短节段减压融合术后退行性腰椎侧凸的影像学进展
Asian Spine J. 2009 Dec;3(2):58-65. doi: 10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.58. Epub 2009 Dec 31.