Murakami Akira M, Anderson Stephan W, Soto Jorge A, Kertesz Jennifer L, Ozonoff Al, Rhea James T
Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, FGH Building, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2009 Sep;16(5):375-82. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0802-1. Epub 2009 Mar 7.
The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and management implications of the finding of active extravasation in blunt or penetrating trauma patients evaluated with abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT) using 64MDCT technology. This HIPAA compliant, retrospective study was IRB-approved, and the need for consent was waived. All adult patients scanned with 64MDCT who sustained blunt or penetrating abdomino-pelvic trauma and had findings of active extravasation at our Level I trauma center during a 30-month period were included. Two radiologists reviewed all abdomino-pelvic CT scans and characterized the active hemorrhage by location, extent, and attenuation on all available phases of imaging. Subsequent therapy and disposition were determined by reviewing the patients' medical records. The relationship between the location of a source of extravasation and subsequent clinical outcome was evaluated using Fischer's exact test. The relationship between the size and attenuation of the active hemorrhage and patient outcome were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. One hundred and twenty-five patients with active extravasation were included. Patients with solid organ or pelvic injuries that were managed conservatively or had a negative digital subtraction angiogram had statistically significant smaller areas of active extravasation when compared to those that required intervention or died. When the attenuation values of extravasation are normalized to the intravascular attenuation achieved after intravenous contrast injection, no significant differences were seen based on subsequent clinical outcome. Based on location, those patients with solid organ, gastrointestinal/mesenteric, and pelvic sources of bleeding showed statistically significant higher likelihood of requiring subsequent intervention or dying, compared with those patients with subcutaneous, intramuscular, or retroperitoneal sources of active extravasation who were more likely to be managed conservatively (p < 0.0001, p = 0.005, p = 0.006, respectively). In blunt and penetrating trauma patients evaluated using 64MDCT technology, the location and size of the region of active extravasation are predictive of the type of subsequent clinical management. Normalized attenuation values of the active extravasation, however, are not predictive of subsequent management.
本研究的目的是确定在使用64排多层螺旋CT(MDCT)技术进行腹部盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)评估的钝性或穿透性创伤患者中,发现活动性血管外渗的临床及处理意义。这项符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的回顾性研究经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,且无需患者签署同意书。纳入了在30个月期间内,于我院一级创伤中心接受64排MDCT扫描、遭受钝性或穿透性腹部盆腔创伤且有活动性血管外渗表现的所有成年患者。两名放射科医生复查了所有腹部盆腔CT扫描,并根据成像所有可用期的位置、范围和衰减情况对活动性出血进行了特征描述。通过查阅患者的病历确定后续治疗及处置方式。使用费舍尔精确检验评估血管外渗源位置与后续临床结果之间的关系。使用威尔科克森秩和检验比较活动性出血的大小和衰减与患者结局之间的关系。共纳入125例有活动性血管外渗的患者。与那些需要干预或死亡的患者相比,保守治疗或数字减影血管造影结果为阴性的实体器官或盆腔损伤患者,其活动性血管外渗区域在统计学上显著更小。当将血管外渗的衰减值归一化为静脉注射造影剂后所达到的血管内衰减值时,基于后续临床结果未发现显著差异。基于位置分析,与皮下、肌肉内或腹膜后活动性血管外渗的患者相比,那些实体器官、胃肠道/肠系膜及盆腔出血源的患者后续需要干预或死亡的可能性在统计学上显著更高,而皮下、肌肉内或腹膜后活动性血管外渗的患者更可能接受保守治疗(分别为p < 0.0001、p = 0.005、p = 0.006)。在使用64排MDCT技术评估的钝性和穿透性创伤患者中,活动性血管外渗区域的位置和大小可预测后续临床处理的类型。然而,活动性血管外渗的归一化衰减值并不能预测后续处理。