Glickstein M, Strata P, Voogd J
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Neuroscience. 2009 Sep 1;162(3):549-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.02.054. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
This paper will outline the history of study of the cerebellum from its beginnings to relatively recent times. Although there is no unanimous agreement about what the cerebellum does or how it does it, some principles of its structure and function are well understood. The historical approach can help to identify remaining questions and point the way to future progress. We make no effort to separate anatomical, physiological and clinical studies; rather, we hope to emphasize their interrelation. The cerebellum has always been seen as a distinct subdivision of the brain. Over the years there was an increasingly accurate description of its gross appearance and major subdivisions. By the beginning of the 19th century, the classical descriptive anatomical work was completed, and experimental study of the functions of the cerebellum began. Lesions were made in the cerebellum of experimental animals, and the behavioral deficits that were caused by the lesion were studied and described. These early animal studies powerfully influenced clinical interpretation of the symptoms seen in patients with cerebellar disease. Several questions are implicit in the anatomical and clinical studies of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, some of which remain incompletely answered. Many of these are addressed in other chapters in this volume. 1. Do different parts of the cerebellum do different things? The uniformity of the neuronal architecture of the cerebellar cortex suggests that each small region must operate in a similar way, but it is also clear that different regions control different functions. Is there a systematic sensory and/or body representation? 2. What are the functions of the cerebellar hemispheres? Massive in humans and very large in primates, their functions remain in dispute. Because the size of the cerebellar hemispheres parallels the development of the cerebral cortex, some have suggested that the hemispheres in humans and the higher primates may play a role in cognitive functions. 3. If one part of the cerebellum is damaged, can another part take over? A related question is whether normal motor function is possible in cases of complete or near-complete agenesis of the cerebellum. 4. What are the functions of the two distinctly different afferent systems to the cerebellum; the climbing and mossy fibers?
本文将概述小脑从起源到近代的研究历史。尽管对于小脑的功能及作用方式尚无一致定论,但人们对其结构和功能的一些原理已有深入了解。历史研究方法有助于找出尚存的问题,并为未来的进展指明方向。我们无意将解剖学、生理学和临床研究区分开来;相反,我们希望强调它们之间的相互关系。小脑一直被视为大脑的一个独特分区。多年来,对其大体外观和主要分区的描述越来越精确。到19世纪初,经典的描述性解剖学工作已完成,小脑功能的实验研究随之展开。人们在实验动物的小脑中制造损伤,并对损伤所导致的行为缺陷进行研究和描述。这些早期的动物研究对小脑疾病患者症状的临床解读产生了重大影响。19世纪和20世纪初的解剖学和临床研究中隐含着几个问题,其中一些问题仍未得到完全解答。本卷的其他章节将探讨其中许多问题。1. 小脑的不同部分功能不同吗?小脑皮质神经元结构的一致性表明,每个小区域的运作方式可能相似,但不同区域控制不同功能这一点也很明确。是否存在系统的感觉和/或身体表征?2. 小脑半球的功能是什么?小脑半球在人类中体积庞大,在灵长类动物中非常大,其功能仍存在争议。由于小脑半球的大小与大脑皮质的发育并行,一些人认为人类和高等灵长类动物的小脑半球可能在认知功能中发挥作用。3. 如果小脑的一部分受损,另一部分能接管其功能吗?一个相关的问题是,在小脑完全或近乎完全发育不全的情况下,正常运动功能是否可能。4. 小脑的两种截然不同的传入系统——攀缘纤维和平行纤维的功能是什么?