Starling Suzanne P, Heisler Kurt W, Paulson James F, Youmans Eren
Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia, USA.
Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e595-602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2938. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
The objective of this study was to determine the level of knowledge, comfort, and training related to the medical management of child abuse among pediatrics, emergency medicine, and family medicine residents.
Surveys were administered to program directors and third-year residents at 67 residency programs. The resident survey included a 24-item quiz to assess knowledge regarding the medical management of physical and sexual child abuse. Sites were solicited from members of a network of child abuse physicians practicing at institutions with residency programs.
Analyzable surveys were received from 53 program directors and 462 residents. Compared with emergency medicine and family medicine programs, pediatric programs were significantly larger and more likely to have a medical provider specializing in child abuse pediatrics, have faculty primarily responsible for child abuse training, use a written curriculum for child abuse training, and offer an elective rotation in child abuse. Exposure to child abuse training and abused patients was highest for pediatric residents and lowest for family medicine residents. Comfort with managing child abuse cases was lowest among family medicine residents. On the knowledge quiz, pediatric residents significantly outperformed emergency medicine and family medicine residents. Residents with high knowledge scores were significantly more likely to come from larger programs and programs that had a center, provider, or interdisciplinary team that specialized in child abuse pediatrics; had a physician on faculty responsible for child abuse training; used a written curriculum for child abuse training; and had a required rotation in child abuse pediatrics.
By analyzing the relationship between program characteristics and residents' child abuse knowledge, we found that pediatric programs provide far more training and resources for child abuse education than emergency medicine and family medicine programs. As leaders, pediatricians must establish the importance of this topic in the pediatric education of residents of all specialties.
本研究的目的是确定儿科、急诊医学和家庭医学住院医师在儿童虐待医疗管理方面的知识水平、舒适度和培训情况。
对67个住院医师培训项目的项目主任和三年级住院医师进行了调查。住院医师调查问卷包括一个24项的测验,以评估有关身体虐待和性虐待儿童医疗管理的知识。调查地点是从在设有住院医师培训项目的机构执业的儿童虐待医生网络成员中征集的。
收到了53名项目主任和462名住院医师的可分析调查问卷。与急诊医学和家庭医学项目相比,儿科项目规模明显更大,更有可能有专门从事儿童虐待儿科的医疗服务提供者,有主要负责儿童虐待培训的教员,使用儿童虐待培训的书面课程,并提供儿童虐待方面的选修轮转。儿科住院医师接受儿童虐待培训和接触受虐待患者的机会最高,家庭医学住院医师最低。家庭医学住院医师处理儿童虐待病例的舒适度最低。在知识测验中,儿科住院医师的表现明显优于急诊医学和家庭医学住院医师。知识得分高的住院医师更有可能来自规模较大的项目,以及设有专门从事儿童虐待儿科的中心、提供者或跨学科团队的项目;有负责儿童虐待培训的教员;使用儿童虐待培训的书面课程;并且有儿童虐待儿科的必修轮转。
通过分析项目特征与住院医师儿童虐待知识之间的关系,我们发现儿科项目在儿童虐待教育方面提供的培训和资源比急诊医学和家庭医学项目多得多。作为领导者,儿科医生必须在所有专业住院医师的儿科教育中确立这一主题的重要性。