Shaughnessy Jutamas, Lewis Lisa A, Jarva Hanna, Ram Sanjay
Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lazare Research Building, Room 370I, Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Infect Immun. 2009 May;77(5):2094-103. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01561-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Both Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae recruit the alternative pathway complement inhibitory protein factor H (fH) to their surfaces to evade complement-dependent killing. Meningococci bind fH via fH binding protein (fHbp), a surface-exposed lipoprotein that is subdivided into three variant families based on one classification scheme. Chimeric proteins that comprise contiguous domains of fH fused to murine Fc were used to localize the binding site for all three fHbp variants on fH to short consensus repeat 6 (SCR 6). As expected, fH-like protein 1 (FHL-1), which contains fH SCR 6, also bound to fHbp-expressing meningococci. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we identified histidine 337 and histidine 371 in SCR 6 as important for binding to fHbp. These findings may provide the molecular basis for recent observations that demonstrated human-specific fH binding to meningococci. Differences in the interactions of fHbp variants with SCR 6 were evident. Gonococci bind fH via their porin (Por) molecules (PorB.1A or PorB.1B); sialylation of lipooligosaccharide enhances fH binding. Both sialylated PorB.1B- and (unsialylated) PorB.1A-bearing gonococci bind fH through SCR 18 to 20; PorB.1A can also bind SCR 6, but only weakly, as evidenced by a low level of binding of FHL-1 relative to that of fH. Using isogenic strains expressing either meningococcal fHbp or gonococcal PorB.1B, we discovered that strains expressing gonococcal PorB.1B in the presence of sialylated lipooligosaccharide bound more fH, more effectively limited C3 deposition, and were more serum resistant than their isogenic counterparts expressing fHbp. Differences in fH binding to these two related pathogens may be important for modulating their individual responses to host immune attack.
脑膜炎奈瑟菌和淋病奈瑟菌都会将替代途径补体抑制蛋白因子H(fH)募集到其表面,以逃避补体依赖性杀伤。脑膜炎球菌通过fH结合蛋白(fHbp)结合fH,fHbp是一种表面暴露的脂蛋白,根据一种分类方案可细分为三个变异家族。包含与小鼠Fc融合的fH连续结构域的嵌合蛋白被用于将fH上所有三种fHbp变体的结合位点定位到短共有重复序列6(SCR 6)。正如预期的那样,包含fH SCR 6的fH样蛋白1(FHL-1)也与表达fHbp的脑膜炎球菌结合。通过定点诱变,我们确定SCR 6中的组氨酸337和组氨酸371对于与fHbp的结合很重要。这些发现可能为最近证明人类特异性fH与脑膜炎球菌结合的观察结果提供分子基础。fHbp变体与SCR 6相互作用的差异很明显。淋球菌通过其孔蛋白(Por)分子(PorB.1A或PorB.1B)结合fH;脂寡糖的唾液酸化增强fH结合。携带唾液酸化PorB.1B和(未唾液酸化)PorB.1A的淋球菌都通过SCR 18至20结合fH;PorB.1A也可以结合SCR 6,但结合较弱,这通过FHL-1相对于fH的低水平结合得到证明。使用表达脑膜炎球菌fHbp或淋球菌PorB.1B的同基因菌株,我们发现,在唾液酸化脂寡糖存在下表达淋球菌PorB.1B的菌株比表达fHbp的同基因对应菌株结合更多的fH,更有效地限制C3沉积,并且血清抗性更强。fH与这两种相关病原体结合的差异可能对调节它们对宿主免疫攻击的个体反应很重要。