Clemons Karl V, Capilla Javier, Sobel Raymond A, Martinez Marife, Tong Ann-Jay, Stevens David A
California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):1858-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01538-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
In separate previous studies, we have shown that lipid-complexed amphotericin B (Abelcet [ABLC]) and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome [AmBi]) are efficacious against coccidioidal meningitis in rabbits. Here, we compared ABLC and AmBi directly in a coccidioidal meningitis model. Male New Zealand White rabbits were infected with 5 x 10(4) Coccidioides posadasii arthroconidia by direct cisternal puncture. Therapy with intravenous ABLC or AmBi at 7.5 or 15 mg/kg of body weight or sterile 5% dextrose water (D5W) began 5 days later. Clinical assessments were done daily; cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples were obtained on day 15 and upon euthanasia. Survivors to day 25 were euthanatized, the numbers of CFU in their tissues were determined, and histology analyses of the brains and spinal cords were done. Controls showed progressive disease, whereas animals treated with either dose of either drug showed few clinical signs of infection. All ABLC- or AmBi-treated rabbits survived, whereas eight of nine D5W-treated rabbits were euthanatized before day 25 (P < 0.0001). Numbers of CFU in the brains and spinal cords of ABLC- or AmBi-treated animals were 100- to 10,000-fold lower than those in the corresponding tissues of D5W-treated animals (P < 0.0006 to 0.0001). However, only two or fewer given a regimen of ABLC or AmBi were cured of infection in both tissues. Fewer ABLC-treated rabbits (four of eight treated with 7.5 mg/kg and five of eight treated with 15 mg/kg) than controls (nine of nine) had meningitis at any level of severity (P, 0.015 or 0.043 for animals treated with ABLC at 7.5 or 15 mg/kg, respectively). Although groups of rabbits treated with AmBi regimens did not have significantly fewer animals with meningitis than the control group (P > 0.05), ABLC and AmBi were not significantly different. In this model, intravenous ABLC and AmBi were similarly highly effective, with few clinical signs of infection, 100% survival, and significantly reduced fungal burdens among treated animals. There appeared to be little benefit in using the 15-mg/kg dosage of either formulation. There was no significant advantage of one drug over the other for this indication. Further studies are required to determine the lowest effective doses of these formulations.
在之前的单独研究中,我们已经表明脂质复合两性霉素B(Abelcet [ABLC])和脂质体两性霉素B(AmBisome [AmBi])对兔球孢子菌性脑膜炎有效。在此,我们在球孢子菌性脑膜炎模型中直接比较了ABLC和AmBi。雄性新西兰白兔通过直接小脑延髓池穿刺感染5×10⁴个波萨达斯球孢子菌关节孢子。5天后开始用静脉注射ABLC或AmBi,剂量为7.5或15 mg/kg体重,或无菌5%葡萄糖水(D5W)进行治疗。每天进行临床评估;在第15天和安乐死时采集脑脊液和血液样本。存活至第25天的动物被安乐死,测定其组织中的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量,并对脑和脊髓进行组织学分析。对照组显示疾病进展,而用两种药物的任一剂量治疗的动物几乎没有感染的临床症状。所有接受ABLC或AmBi治疗的兔子均存活,而9只接受D5W治疗的兔子中有8只在第25天前被安乐死(P < 0.0001)。接受ABLC或AmBi治疗的动物脑和脊髓中的CFU数量比接受D5W治疗的动物相应组织中的CFU数量低100至10000倍(P < 0.0006至0.0001)。然而,在两种组织中,接受ABLC或AmBi治疗方案的动物中只有两只或更少被治愈感染。与对照组(9只中的9只)相比,接受ABLC治疗的兔子(7.5 mg/kg治疗的8只中有4只,15 mg/kg治疗的8只中有5只)在任何严重程度水平下患脑膜炎的数量更少(分别接受7.5或15 mg/kg ABLC治疗的动物,P值分别为0.015或0.043)。虽然接受AmBi治疗方案的兔组患脑膜炎的动物数量与对照组相比没有显著减少(P > 0.05),但ABLC和AmBi之间没有显著差异。在该模型中,静脉注射ABLC和AmBi同样高效,感染的临床症状很少,存活率为100%,且治疗动物体内的真菌负荷显著降低。使用15 mg/kg剂量的任何一种制剂似乎都没有什么益处。对于该适应症,一种药物相对于另一种药物没有显著优势。需要进一步研究以确定这些制剂的最低有效剂量。