Bell Jason, Badcock David R
School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):843-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Radial Frequency (RF) contours provide a unifying system to represent familiar shapes, such as triangles (RF3), squares (RF4) and pentagons (RF5), but it is not clear whether these sorts of shapes are detected by separate RF-tuned processes, or instead by a common shape mechanism. It has been suggested that multiple mechanisms are responsible for the detection of globally processed RF patterns, at least up to RF10. In this study, we used a sub-threshold summation paradigm to determine whether multiple shape channels are required to account for detection of RF patterns in this range. To do so, the modulation detection threshold required for discriminating an RF component in isolation from a circle, was compared to that obtained when a second, half-threshold amplitude, component was added to the single closed-contour. Threshold improvement occurred when the two shape components were the same RF, but usually not when the components differed in RF. These results cannot be explained by a single broadly-tuned shape channel and suggest that several narrow-band RF channels underpin detection of patterns below RF10, where the shapes have previously been shown to be processed globally.
径向频率(RF)轮廓提供了一个统一的系统来表示常见形状,如三角形(RF3)、正方形(RF4)和五边形(RF5),但尚不清楚这些形状是通过单独的RF调谐过程检测到的,还是通过一种通用的形状机制检测到的。有人提出,多种机制负责检测全局处理的RF模式,至少在RF10之前是这样。在本研究中,我们使用亚阈值求和范式来确定是否需要多个形状通道来解释该范围内RF模式的检测。为此,将从圆中分离出一个RF分量时所需的调制检测阈值,与当第二个半阈值幅度分量添加到单个封闭轮廓时获得的阈值进行了比较。当两个形状分量具有相同的RF时,阈值会提高,但当分量的RF不同时通常不会。这些结果不能用单个宽调谐形状通道来解释,这表明几个窄带RF通道是低于RF10的模式检测的基础,之前已证明该范围内的形状是全局处理的。