• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对接受促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗的癌症患者血红蛋白和/或血细胞比容水平与血栓形成情况进行回顾性分析。

Retrospective review of hemoglobin and/or hematocrit levels with occurrence of thrombosis in cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis stimulating agents.

作者信息

Fullmer Amber C, Miller Rickey

机构信息

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009 Sep;15(3):167-73. doi: 10.1177/1078155209102337. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1177/1078155209102337
PMID:19276139
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No data exists that directly compares hemoglobin and hematocrit levels between cancer patients with and without occurrence of thrombosis during treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of hemoglobin and hematocrit levels with the occurrence of thrombosis in cancer patients treated with ESAs.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study approved by the Institutional Review Board was conducted on cancer patients billed for epoetin or darbepoetin between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2007. Cases were defined as patients billed for thrombosis while controls were defined as patients not billed for thrombosis.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had an occurrence of thrombosis (cases) and were matched to 16 patients that did not have an occurrence of thrombosis (controls) based on age, sex, and cancer type. The mean peak hemoglobin levels for cases and controls were 12.6 +/- 1.2 g/dL versus 12.6 +/- 1.4 g/dL (p = 0.9). The mean peak hematocrit levels for cases and controls were 37.3 +/- 3.8% versus 37.9 +/- 4.3% (p = 0.8). For the 16/586 (2.7%) patients with thrombosis, the mean hemoglobin and hematocrit at time of thrombosis were 9.6 +/- 1.0 g/dL and 28.9 +/- 3.1%. A significant identifiable risk factor for thrombosis between the cases and controls was history of thrombosis 31.3% versus 0% (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical difference in peak hemoglobin and hematocrit levels between patients with thrombosis and those without thrombosis. Further study is warranted to determine if these levels are true risk factors for thrombosis.

摘要

背景

目前尚无数据直接比较接受促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)治疗的癌症患者中发生血栓和未发生血栓者的血红蛋白和血细胞比容水平。

目的

确定接受ESAs治疗的癌症患者中血红蛋白和血细胞比容水平与血栓形成之间的关联。

方法

对2002年7月1日至2007年6月30日期间因促红细胞生成素或 darbepoetin 计费的癌症患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性病例对照研究。病例定义为因血栓形成计费的患者,对照定义为未因血栓形成计费的患者。

结果

16例患者发生血栓形成(病例组),并根据年龄、性别和癌症类型与16例未发生血栓形成的患者(对照组)进行匹配。病例组和对照组的平均血红蛋白峰值水平分别为12.6±1.2 g/dL和12.6±1.4 g/dL(p = 0.9)。病例组和对照组的平均血细胞比容峰值水平分别为37.3±3.8%和37.9±4.3%(p = 0.8)。对于16/586(2.7%)例发生血栓形成的患者,血栓形成时的平均血红蛋白和血细胞比容分别为9.6±1.0 g/dL和28.9±3.1%。病例组和对照组之间血栓形成的一个显著可识别风险因素是血栓形成病史,分别为31.3%和0%(p = 0.04)。

结论

发生血栓和未发生血栓的患者之间血红蛋白和血细胞比容峰值水平无统计学差异。有必要进一步研究以确定这些水平是否是血栓形成的真正风险因素。

相似文献

1
Retrospective review of hemoglobin and/or hematocrit levels with occurrence of thrombosis in cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis stimulating agents.对接受促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗的癌症患者血红蛋白和/或血细胞比容水平与血栓形成情况进行回顾性分析。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009 Sep;15(3):167-73. doi: 10.1177/1078155209102337. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
2
Utilization of darbepoetin alfa in relation to cancer patients' hemoglobin levels.促红细胞生成素α在癌症患者血红蛋白水平方面的应用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):815-9. doi: 10.1185/030079908X280383. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
3
Erythropoietic agents in anaemic patients with cancer: a retrospective observational survey of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha use in routine clinical practice.癌症贫血患者使用促红细胞生成剂:促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯α在常规临床实践中的回顾性观察调查
Oncol Rep. 2005 Oct;14(4):1037-44.
4
Effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy induced anemia in patients with gynecologic malignancies.达贝泊汀α与促红细胞生成素α治疗妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗所致贫血的疗效比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Jun;101(3):499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
5
A US multicenter, retrospective, observational study of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent utilization in anemic, critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit.一项关于入住重症监护病房的贫血重症患者促红细胞生成素刺激剂使用情况的美国多中心回顾性观察研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Dec;30(12):2324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.024.
6
A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of immediate versus delayed intervention with darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia.一项关于阿法达贝泊汀对化疗所致贫血进行即时干预与延迟干预的随机、开放标签、多中心试验。
Oncologist. 2007 Oct;12(10):1253-63. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-10-1253.
7
Efficacy and safety of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia of cancer: a controlled, randomized, open-label phase II trial.每两周一次使用达贝泊汀α治疗癌症贫血患者的疗效与安全性:一项对照、随机、开放标签的II期试验。
Oncologist. 2007 Jun;12(6):727-37. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-727.
8
Dosing intervals and hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa: a retrospective cohort study.慢性肾脏病合并贫血患者接受促红细胞生成素α或达比加群酯治疗时的给药间隔与血红蛋白控制:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):2010-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.012.
9
Use and cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer.癌症患者促红细胞生成素的使用及费用
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jul;25(7):1775-84. doi: 10.1185/03007990903001150.
10
Comparison of the therapeutic effects of epoetin zeta to epoetin alfa in the maintenance phase of renal anaemia treatment.在肾性贫血治疗维持阶段,泽他促红细胞生成素与阿法促红细胞生成素治疗效果的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):625-37. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273264.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of use and risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among Medicare patients with cancer.医疗保险癌症患者中促红细胞生成素刺激剂的使用模式及相关风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1633-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp387. Epub 2009 Nov 10.