White Lars O, Mansell Warren
Division of Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):111-24. doi: 10.1002/cpp.607.
Jumping to conclusions (JTC) has been proposed as an aetiological factor involved in the formation of delusions from the earliest stages. A number of researchers have thus shifted their focus to include the study of subclinical populations. Expanding on these studies, 17 delusion-prone and 22 control students completed four versions of the beads-in-a-jar paradigm (including multiple jar variants) to test recent claims regarding JTC's specificity to less ambiguous paradigms with a limited number of jars. Additional measures were administered to tease out a potential mechanism underlying JTC. The delusion-prone group showed a higher JTC bias which proved relatively robust across variants. Task performance was related to degree of self-reported rushing. It is concluded that delusion-prone individuals exhibit JTC, even when confronted with more ambiguous scenarios, potentially as a consequence of feeling rushed.
过早下结论(JTC)已被提出是从最早阶段就参与妄想形成的一个病因因素。因此,许多研究人员已将重点转移到对亚临床人群的研究。在这些研究的基础上,17名易产生妄想的学生和22名对照学生完成了四个版本的罐中珠子范式(包括多个罐子变体),以检验最近关于JTC对罐子数量有限的较不模糊范式的特异性的说法。还采用了其他测量方法来梳理JTC背后的潜在机制。易产生妄想的组表现出更高的JTC偏差,这在各变体中都相对稳定。任务表现与自我报告的匆忙程度有关。研究得出结论,即使面对更模糊的情景,易产生妄想的个体也会表现出JTC,这可能是感到匆忙的结果。