• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妄想的变化与“草率结论”的变化有关。

Change in delusions is associated with change in "jumping to conclusions".

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.020
PMID:19906443
Abstract

Evidence has been put forward that premature termination of data collection and jumping to conclusions behavior (JTC) is associated with delusions. However, few investigations have attempted to track associations between changes in delusions and changes in JTC measures. In the current study individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders completed a version of the JTC task (involving fishing from lakes as opposed to drawing beads from a jar) at two timepoints 12 weeks apart. The results revealed significant negative correlations between change in task performance (number of requested pieces of information) and change in delusion scores over time. This evidence is consistent with the contention that the JTC task is sensitive to the cognitive systems underlying delusions in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

摘要

已经有证据表明,数据收集过早终止和草率下结论行为(JTC)与妄想有关。然而,很少有研究试图追踪妄想变化和 JTC 测量变化之间的关联。在目前的研究中,精神分裂症谱系障碍患者在相隔 12 周的两个时间点完成了 JTC 任务的一个版本(涉及从湖中钓鱼而不是从罐中抽取珠子)。结果表明,任务表现(请求的信息量)的变化与妄想分数随时间的变化之间存在显著的负相关。这一证据与 JTC 任务对精神分裂症谱系障碍中妄想的认知系统敏感的观点一致。

相似文献

1
Change in delusions is associated with change in "jumping to conclusions".妄想的变化与“草率结论”的变化有关。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis.妄想中的认知功能:一项纵向分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):481-514. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.008.
3
The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: specificity and changeability.错觉中的草率结论偏差:特异性和可变性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):40-9. doi: 10.1037/a0018118.
4
Failing to ponder? Delusion-prone individuals rush to conclusions.不善思考?易产生错觉的人急于下结论。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):111-24. doi: 10.1002/cpp.607.
5
Over-adjustment or miscomprehension? A re-examination of the jumping to conclusions bias.过度调整还是误解?对仓促结论偏差的再检验。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;46(6):532-40. doi: 10.1177/0004867411435291. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
'Jumping to conclusions' and delusions in psychosis: relationship and response to treatment.精神病中的“急于下结论”与妄想:关系及对治疗的反应
Schizophr Res. 2008 Jan;98(1-3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.021. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
7
When does jumping-to-conclusions reach its peak? The interaction of vulnerability and situation-characteristics in social reasoning.当跳跃式结论达到顶峰时会发生什么?社会推理中脆弱性和情境特征的相互作用。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;42(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.09.005.
8
Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs.草率下结论与妄想信念的连续体
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1255-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
9
Jumping to conclusions style along the continuum of delusions: delusion-prone individuals are not hastier in decision making than healthy individuals.沿着妄想连续体的草率下结论方式:易产生妄想的个体在决策时并不比健康个体更草率。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0121347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121347. eCollection 2015.
10
The cognitive and affective structure of paranoid delusions: a transdiagnostic investigation of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and depression.偏执妄想的认知与情感结构:对精神分裂症谱系障碍和抑郁症患者的跨诊断研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;66(3):236-47. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychotic-Like Reasoning Styles in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder? An Experimental Investigation of the Jumping to Conclusions Bias.边缘型人格障碍患者类似精神病的推理方式?对妄下结论偏差的实验研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):e70051. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70051.
2
Reasoning and interpretation cognitive biases related to psychotic characteristics: An umbrella-review.与精神病性特征相关的推理和解释认知偏差:一项伞状综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0314965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314965. eCollection 2024.
3
The Effect of Situational Experiment Conditions on Hasty Decision Making in the 'Beads Task'.
情境实验条件对“珠子任务”中仓促决策的影响
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 19;13(2):359. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020359.
4
Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training.精神病性障碍中信念不稳定性的增加预示着对元认知训练的治疗反应。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jun 21;48(4):826-838. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac029.
5
Is intuition allied with jumping to conclusions in decision-making? An intensive longitudinal study in patients with delusions and in non-clinical individuals.在决策中,直觉是否与草率下结论有关?一项针对妄想症患者和非临床个体的密集纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0261296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261296. eCollection 2021.
6
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.
7
Thinking Preferences and Conspiracy Belief: Intuitive Thinking and the Jumping to Conclusions-Bias as a Basis for the Belief in Conspiracy Theories.思维偏好与阴谋论信念:直觉思维以及急于下结论偏差作为相信阴谋论的基础
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 18;11:568942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568942. eCollection 2020.
8
The Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) on P3 Event-Related Potentials during a Bayesian Oddball Task.经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)对贝叶斯Oddball任务期间P3事件相关电位的影响。
Brain Sci. 2020 Jun 25;10(6):404. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10060404.
9
An Integrative and Mechanistic Model of Impaired Belief Updating in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症中信念更新受损的综合与机制模型。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17;39(29):5630-5633. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0002-19.2019.
10
Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.双加工理论、冲突加工与妄想信念。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101748. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101748. Epub 2019 Jun 12.