Lane Wendy G, Dubowitz Howard
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Feb;33(2):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
We assessed the self-reported experience, comfort and competence of primary care pediatricians in evaluating and managing child maltreatment (CM), in rendering opinions regarding the likelihood of CM, and in providing court testimony. We examined pediatricians' need for expert consultation when evaluating possible maltreatment.
A questionnaire was mailed to 520 randomly selected AAP members. Pediatricians were asked how frequently they evaluated and reported children for suspected maltreatment, and whether child abuse pediatricians were available to and used by them. Pediatricians were asked to rate their knowledge, comfort and competence in the management of CM. Demographic information was also gathered. Pediatricians' experience with CM, their comfort, self-reported competence, and need for expert assistance is described. Logistic regression was used to assess factors that predicted pediatricians' sense of competence while controlling for covariates found to be significant in bivariate analyses.
One hundred forty-seven questionnaires were eligible for analysis. The majority of respondents had little experience evaluating and reporting suspected CM, and was interested in having expert consultation. While pediatricians often felt competent in conducting medical exams for suspected maltreatment, they felt less competent in rendering a definitive opinion, and did not generally feel competent to testify in court. Sense of competence was particularly low for sexual abuse. Increased practice experience and more courses in CM led to increased sense of competence in some areas.
Pediatricians acknowledged many limitations to providing care to maltreated children, and expressed interest in subspecialist input.
These findings add additional support to the American Board of Pediatrics' decision to create a Child Abuse Pediatrics subspecialty. The findings also indicate a need to ensure funding for fellowship training programs in this field.
我们评估了基层儿科医生在评估和处理儿童虐待(CM)、就儿童虐待的可能性发表意见以及提供法庭证词方面自我报告的经验、舒适度和能力。我们研究了儿科医生在评估可能的虐待情况时对专家咨询的需求。
向520名随机挑选的美国儿科学会成员邮寄了一份问卷。询问儿科医生他们评估和报告疑似虐待儿童的频率,以及他们是否可以获得并使用儿童虐待儿科专家的服务。要求儿科医生对他们在儿童虐待管理方面的知识、舒适度和能力进行评分。还收集了人口统计学信息。描述了儿科医生在儿童虐待方面的经验、他们的舒适度、自我报告的能力以及对专家协助的需求。使用逻辑回归来评估在控制双变量分析中发现具有显著意义的协变量的同时预测儿科医生能力感的因素。
147份问卷符合分析条件。大多数受访者在评估和报告疑似儿童虐待方面经验很少,并且有兴趣获得专家咨询。虽然儿科医生在对疑似虐待进行医学检查时通常感觉有能力,但在给出明确意见时他们感觉能力较弱,并且一般不觉得有能力在法庭上作证。对于性虐待,能力感特别低。实践经验的增加和更多关于儿童虐待的课程导致在某些领域的能力感增强。
儿科医生承认在为受虐待儿童提供护理方面存在许多限制,并表示有兴趣获得专科医生的意见。
这些发现为美国儿科学会创建儿童虐待儿科亚专业的决定提供了更多支持。研究结果还表明需要确保为该领域的专科培训项目提供资金。