Ozkan Ugur, Oguzkurt Levent, Tercan Fahri, Gumus Burcak
Department of Radiology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 May;32(3):417-21. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9527-5. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
The aim of this study was to report our experience in endovascular treatment of total aortoiliac occlusion. Five patients who underwent endovascular recanalization procedures including manual aspiration thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, and stent placement for total aortoiliac occlusion in a 4-year period were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age of patients was 51 years (range, 43 to 58 years). All patients had abdominal aorta and bilateral common iliac artery occlusion with or without external iliac artery occlusion. All patients either had a contraindication to surgery or refused it. Initial technical success was obtained in four of five (80%) patients. Endovascular techniques were successful in four patients who had good distal runoff and short-segment aortoiliac occlusion, but failed in a patient who had the worst distal runoff and long-segment aortoiliac occlusion. We observed two major complications, one of which was bilateral rupture of the common iliac arteries treated with covered stent placement. Another patient had extension of intra-aortic thrombus into the iliac stent after primary stenting. This was successfully treated with manual aspiration thrombectomy. Aortic and iliac stents remained patent during the follow-up period (median, 18 months; range, 3 to 26 months) in four patients. Primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were all 80%. In conclusion, endovascular treatment can be an alternative for aortoiliac occlusion in selected patients. Short- to midterm follow-up so far is satisfactory. Removal of intra-aortic thrombus with manual aspiration thrombectomy before balloon angioplasty and/or stenting is possible and a good alternative to thrombolysis.
本研究的目的是报告我们在全主动脉髂动脉闭塞血管内治疗方面的经验。回顾性分析了4年间5例接受血管内再通手术(包括手动抽吸血栓切除术、球囊血管成形术和支架置入术)治疗全主动脉髂动脉闭塞的患者。患者的平均年龄为51岁(范围43至58岁)。所有患者均有腹主动脉和双侧髂总动脉闭塞,伴或不伴有髂外动脉闭塞。所有患者均有手术禁忌证或拒绝手术。5例患者中有4例(80%)获得了初始技术成功。血管内技术在4例远端血流良好且主动脉髂动脉闭塞段较短的患者中成功,但在1例远端血流最差且主动脉髂动脉闭塞段较长的患者中失败。我们观察到2例主要并发症,其中1例是双侧髂总动脉破裂,采用覆膜支架置入术治疗。另1例患者在初次置入支架后主动脉内血栓延伸至髂动脉支架内。通过手动抽吸血栓切除术成功治疗。4例患者在随访期间(中位时间18个月;范围3至26个月)主动脉和髂动脉支架保持通畅。6个月、12个月和24个月时的主要通畅率均为80%。总之,血管内治疗可作为特定患者主动脉髂动脉闭塞的一种替代治疗方法。迄今为止,短期至中期随访结果令人满意。在球囊血管成形术和/或支架置入术前通过手动抽吸血栓切除术清除主动脉内血栓是可行的,并且是溶栓的良好替代方法。