Ozasa Kotaro, Washio Masakazu
Department of Epidemiology for Community Health and Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2009 Jan;56(1):18-24.
Vaccination against influenza is recommended for subjects at high risk of severe complications if infected with the influenza virus. The effectiveness of influenza vaccination among the elderly has been evaluated in many observational studies but only in a few randomized control trials. However, observational studies have various issues. First, the outcomes should be of high specificity with low nondifferential misclassification, such as laboratory-confirmed influenza or high fever. Differential misclassification between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants may also be a complicating factor due to behavioral differences in the habits of participants with regard to visiting physicians or in the diagnostic processes of physicians. Therefore, preventing differential misclassification by equally precise observation in compared groups seems to be more important than the specificity of outcomes, even if this can be achieved only by techniques with low-specificity outcomes. In observational studies of the elderly, vaccinated elderly individuals may be at low risk of influenza infection or death because they are health conscious. Such confounding may lead to an overestimation of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination. To minimize bias and to adjust for confounders, the effectiveness of influenza vaccination should be compared taking into account the following groups/indicators: influenza season and pre-season, well-matched season and mismatched season between vaccine and circulating viruses, severe season and mild season, high-specificity outcomes and low-specificity outcomes. Low effectiveness is to be expected with the latter of each pair. If no difference in effectiveness is observed between the two conditions in each pair, residual confounding may be present and the true underlying risk factors should be sought. For example, elderly individuals with impaired functional status in addition to chronic diseases may be less able to access vaccination. Hence it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination among such elderly individuals and promote vaccination in those people.
对于感染流感病毒后有严重并发症高风险的人群,建议接种流感疫苗。许多观察性研究评估了流感疫苗在老年人中的有效性,但只有少数随机对照试验。然而,观察性研究存在各种问题。首先,结果应具有高特异性且非差异性错误分类率低,例如实验室确诊的流感或高烧。由于接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的参与者在看医生习惯或医生诊断过程方面存在行为差异,两者之间的差异性错误分类也可能是一个复杂因素。因此,通过在比较组中进行同样精确的观察来防止差异性错误分类似乎比结果的特异性更重要,即使这只能通过低特异性结果的技术来实现。在对老年人的观察性研究中,接种疫苗的老年人可能因有健康意识而处于流感感染或死亡的低风险中。这种混杂因素可能导致对流感疫苗有效性的高估。为了尽量减少偏差并调整混杂因素,应考虑以下组/指标来比较流感疫苗的有效性:流感季节和季前、疫苗与流行病毒匹配良好的季节和不匹配的季节、严重季节和轻度季节、高特异性结果和低特异性结果。每对中的后者预期有效性较低。如果在每对的两种情况之间未观察到有效性差异,则可能存在残余混杂因素,应寻找真正的潜在风险因素。例如,除慢性病外功能状态受损的老年人可能较难获得疫苗接种。因此,有必要评估此类老年人的疫苗接种有效性,并促进这些人群接种疫苗。