Meyer Gabriele, Köpke Sascha, Haastert Burkhard, Mühlhauser Ingrid
Unit of Health Sciences and Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):981-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02460.x.
To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12-month follow-up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes.
High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint-free care.
Cross-sectional study and prospective cohort study.
Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany.
External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents' records and prospective data were documented by nurses.
Residents' mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.3-31.1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 58.9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24.5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26.3% (21.3-31.3) cumulated to 39.5% (33.3-45.7) at the end of follow-up (10.4 SD 3.3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4.9-64.8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences.
The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints.
Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence-based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint-free nursing home care.
调查(1)身体约束和精神活性药物的使用 prevalence,(2)新实施的身体约束、设备使用频率以及12个月随访期间按需使用精神活性药物的频率,以及(3)养老院中与约束使用相关的特征。
目前德国养老院中缺乏关于约束使用的高质量数据。此类信息是实现无约束护理干预措施的基础。
横断面研究和前瞻性队列研究。
德国汉堡的30家养老院及2367名居民。
外部调查人员通过在一天内三次直接观察获得身体约束的 prevalence,从居民记录中提取精神活性药物信息,并由护士记录前瞻性数据。
居民平均年龄为86岁,81%为女性。至少使用一种身体约束的居民 prevalence 为26.2%[95%置信区间(CI)21.3 - 31.1]。各中心 prevalence 范围为4.4%至58.9%。床栏使用最为频繁(24.5%的居民使用),固定桌、安全带和其他约束较少见。至少使用一种精神活性药物的居民 prevalence 为52.4%(95%CI 48.7 - 56.1)。在随访第一周首次观察时至少使用一种身体约束的居民比例为26.3%(21.3 - 31.3),随访结束时(10.4±3.3个月)累计至39.5%(33.3 - 45.7)。各中心至少使用一种设备的观察日相对频率范围为4.9% - 64.8%。未发现可解释中心差异的特征。
德国养老院中身体约束和精神活性药物的使用频率较高。显著的中心差异表明无约束的标准护理是可行的。
迫切需要有效的约束最小化方法。基于证据的指南可能克服中心差异,实现无约束的养老院护理。