Van Nuffelen Gwen, De Bodt Marc, Wuyts Floris, Van de Heyning Paul
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61(2):69-75. doi: 10.1159/000208805. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
This study investigated the effect of rate control methods (RCMs) on speaking rate (SR), articulation rate (AR), and intelligibility in dysarthric speakers.
Nineteen dysarthric patients (7 unilateral upper motor neuron dysarthria, 6 hypokinetic, 3 flaccid, 3 ataxic) participated. SR, AR and intelligibility ratings were determined on the basis of 1-min recorded reading passages. Seven RCMs were applied: voluntary rate control, hand tapping, alphabet board, pacing board and delayed auditory feedback with a delay of 50, 100 and 150 ms.
Almost all methods resulted in lower mean SRs and ARs (p < 0.05). Rate control did not improve overall intelligibility of the dysarthric population. However, a meaningful increase of intelligibility was found in 5 participants. This study indicates that the effect of rate control on intelligibility is independent of habitual speech rate and type of dysarthria. Degree of intelligibility may be an influencing factor. The most effective methods are: voluntary rate control, alphabet board, hand tapping and pacing board.
RCMs do result in lower speech rates. Some dysarthric individuals do benefit from one or more RCMs, but rate control may also have an inverse effect on intelligibility.
本研究调查了速率控制方法(RCMs)对构音障碍患者的说话速率(SR)、清晰度速率(AR)和可懂度的影响。
19名构音障碍患者(7名单侧上运动神经元构音障碍、6名运动减少型、3名弛缓型、3名共济失调型)参与了研究。基于1分钟的朗读段落录音确定SR、AR和可懂度评分。应用了七种RCMs:自主速率控制、手部敲击、字母板、节奏板以及延迟50、100和150毫秒的延迟听觉反馈。
几乎所有方法都导致平均SR和AR降低(p<0.05)。速率控制并未提高构音障碍人群的整体可懂度。然而,在5名参与者中发现可懂度有显著提高。本研究表明,速率控制对可懂度的影响与习惯性语速和构音障碍类型无关。可懂度程度可能是一个影响因素。最有效的方法是:自主速率控制、字母板、手部敲击和节奏板。
RCMs确实会导致语速降低。一些构音障碍个体确实从一种或多种RCMs中受益,但速率控制也可能对可懂度产生相反的影响。