Hans Didier, Krieg Marc-Antoine
Orthopedic Department , Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51 Suppl 1:S25-37. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342009000700006.
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) appears to be developing into an acceptable, low-cost and readily-accessible alternative to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the detection and management of osteoporosis. Perhaps the major difficulty with their widespread use is that many different QUS devices exist that differ substantially from each other, in terms of the parameters they measure and the strength of empirical evidence supporting their use. But another problem is that virtually no data exist outside of Caucasian or Asian populations. In general, heel QUS appears to be most tested and most effective. Some, but not all heel QUS devices are effective assessing fracture risk in some, but not all populations, the evidence being strongest for Caucasian females > 55 years old, though some evidence exists for Asian females > 55 and for Caucasian and Asian males > 70. Certain devices may allow to estimate the likelihood of osteoporosis, but very limited evidence exists supporting QUS use during the initiation or monitoring of osteoporosis treatment. Likely, QUS is most effective when combined with an assessment of clinical risk factors (CRF); with DXA reserved for individuals who are not identified as either high or low risk using QUS and CRF. However, monitoring and maintenance of test and instrument accuracy, precision and reproducibility are essential if QUS devices are to be used in clinical practice; and further scientific research in non-Caucasian, non-Asian populations clearly is compulsory to validate this tool for more widespread use.
定量超声(QUS)似乎正在发展成为一种可接受的、低成本且易于获取的替代方法,用于在骨质疏松症的检测和管理中替代双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量骨密度(BMD)。它们广泛应用的主要困难可能在于存在许多不同的QUS设备,这些设备在测量参数以及支持其使用的经验证据强度方面存在很大差异。但另一个问题是,除了高加索人群或亚洲人群之外,几乎没有相关数据。一般来说,足跟QUS似乎是测试最多且最有效的。一些(但不是所有)足跟QUS设备在一些(但不是所有)人群中能有效评估骨折风险,证据对于55岁以上的高加索女性最为有力,不过对于55岁以上的亚洲女性以及70岁以上的高加索和亚洲男性也有一些证据。某些设备可能允许估计骨质疏松症的可能性,但支持在骨质疏松症治疗开始或监测期间使用QUS的证据非常有限。可能的情况是,当QUS与临床风险因素(CRF)评估相结合时最为有效;对于使用QUS和CRF未被确定为高风险或低风险的个体,则保留使用DXA。然而,如果要在临床实践中使用QUS设备,监测和维护测试及仪器的准确性、精密度和可重复性至关重要;并且显然必须在非高加索、非亚洲人群中进行进一步的科学研究,以验证该工具以便更广泛地使用。