Suppr超能文献

定量超声(QUS)在骨质疏松症检测与管理中的临床应用。

The clinical use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the detection and management of osteoporosis.

作者信息

Hans D, Krieg M A

机构信息

Dept. of Bone & Joint, Lausanne Univ. Hosp., Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008 Jul;55(7):1529-38. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.829.

Abstract

For the detection and management of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is emerging as a relatively low-cost and readily accessible alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in certain circumstances. The following is a brief, but thorough review of the existing literature with respect to the use of QUS in 6 settings: 1) assessing fragility fracture risk; 2) diagnosing osteoporosis; 3) initiating osteoporosis treatment; 4) monitoring osteoporosis treatment; 5) osteoporosis case finding; and 6) quality assurance and control. Many QUS devices exist that are quite different with respect to the parameters they measure and the strength of empirical evidence supporting their use. In general, heel QUS appears to be most tested and most effective. Overall, some, but not all, heel QUS devices are effective assessing fracture risk in some, but not all, populations, the evidence being strongest for Caucasian females over 55 years old. Otherwise, the evidence is fair with respect to certain devices allowing for the accurate diagnosis of likelihood of osteoporosis, and generally fair to poor in terms of QUS use when initiating or monitoring osteoporosis treatment. A reasonable protocol is proposed herein for case-finding purposes, which relies on a combined assessment of clinical risk factors (CR.F) and heel QUS. Finally, several recommendations are made for quality assurance and control.

摘要

对于骨质疏松症及骨质疏松相关骨折的检测与管理,在某些情况下,定量超声(QUS)正成为一种成本相对较低且易于获得的替代方法,可用于替代双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量骨矿物质密度(BMD)。以下是对现有文献中QUS在6种情况下应用的简要但全面的综述:1)评估脆性骨折风险;2)诊断骨质疏松症;3)启动骨质疏松症治疗;4)监测骨质疏松症治疗;5)骨质疏松症病例筛查;6)质量保证与控制。现有的许多QUS设备在测量参数以及支持其使用的实证证据强度方面存在很大差异。一般来说,足跟QUS似乎经过了最多的测试且最为有效。总体而言,部分(但并非全部)足跟QUS设备能在部分(但并非全部)人群中有效评估骨折风险,对于55岁以上的白人女性,证据最为充分。否则,对于某些能够准确诊断骨质疏松症可能性的设备,证据尚可;而在启动或监测骨质疏松症治疗时使用QUS,总体证据水平一般至较差。本文提出了一个用于病例筛查目的的合理方案,该方案依赖于对临床风险因素(CR.F)和足跟QUS的综合评估。最后,针对质量保证与控制提出了若干建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验