Suppr超能文献

熏蒸型和非熏蒸型杀线虫剂防治花生上南方根结线虫的效果

Efficacy of Fumigant and Nonfurmigant Nematicides for Control of Meloidogyne arenaria on Peanut.

作者信息

Dickson D W, Hewlett T E

出版信息

J Nematol. 1988 Oct;20(Annals 2):95-101.

Abstract

Three tests were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of fumigant and nonfumigant nematicides for control of Meloidogyne arenaria race 1 on peanut. Methyl bromide, 1,3-D, methyl isothiocyanate, and methyl isothiocyanate mixtures were applied 7 or 8 days preplant either broadcast or in-the-row. Aldicarb, ethoprop, fenamiphos, and F5145 were applied at different rates and by different methods at-plant or at early flowering. Of the 32 treatments evaluated, only seven resulted in yield increases (P = 0.05), although early season vigor was high in all treated plots. During the latter one-third of the growing season, however, nematode control was not adequate in most treatments resulting in heavy peg, pod, and root infection by M. arenaria.

摘要

进行了三项试验,以评估熏蒸型和非熏蒸型杀线虫剂对花生上南方根结线虫1号小种的防治效果。在种植前7天或8天,将溴甲烷、1,3 - 二氯丙烯、异硫氰酸甲酯以及异硫氰酸甲酯混合物进行撒施或沟施。涕灭威、灭线磷、苯线磷和F5145在种植时或初花期以不同剂量和方法施用。在所评估的32种处理中,只有7种处理使产量增加(P = 0.05),尽管所有处理地块在生长季早期活力都很高。然而,在生长季的后三分之一时间里,大多数处理对线虫的防治效果不佳,导致花生果针、荚果和根系受到南方根结线虫的严重侵染。

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验