Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Mar 16;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-2-6.
Two-step dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood, either as a stand-alone process or as pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis, is considered to result in higher sugar yields than one-step acid hydrolysis. However, this requires removal of the liquid between the two steps. In an industrial process, filtration and washing of the material between the two steps is difficult, as it should be performed at high pressure to reduce energy demand. Moreover, the application of pressure leads to more compact solids, which may affect subsequent processing steps. This study was carried out to investigate the influence of pressing the biomass, in combination with the effects of not washing the material, on the sugar yield obtained from two-step dilute acid hydrolysis, with and without subsequent enzymatic digestion of the solids.
Washing the material between the two acid hydrolysis steps, followed by enzymatic digestion, resulted in recovery of 96% of the mannose and 81% of the glucose (% of the theoretical) in the liquid fraction, regardless of the choice of dewatering method (pressing or vacuum filtration). Not washing the solids between the two acid hydrolysis steps led to elevated acidity of the remaining solids during the second hydrolysis step, which resulted in lower yields of mannose, 85% and 74% of the theoretical, for the pressed and vacuum-filtered slurry, respectively, due to sugar degradation. However, this increase in acidity resulted in a higher glucose yield (94.2%) from pressed slurry than from filtered slurry (77.6%).
Pressing the washed material between the two acid hydrolysis steps had no significant negative effect on the sugar yields of the second acid hydrolysis step or on enzymatic hydrolysis. Not washing the material resulted in a harsher second acid hydrolysis step, which caused greater degradation of the sugars during subsequent acid hydrolysis of the solids, particularly in case of the vacuum-filtered solids. However, pressing in combination with not washing the material between the two steps enhanced the sugar yield of the enzymatic digestion step. Hence, it is suggested that the unwashed slurry be pressed to as high a dry matter content as possible between the two acid hydrolysis stages in order to achieve high final sugar yields.
两步稀酸水解软木,无论是作为独立的过程还是在酶水解之前的预处理,都被认为比一步酸水解产生更高的糖产率。然而,这需要去除两步之间的液体。在工业过程中,由于应在高压下进行过滤和洗涤以降低能耗,因此在两步之间对材料进行过滤和洗涤非常困难。此外,应用压力会导致固体更加紧密,这可能会影响后续的加工步骤。本研究旨在探讨在不洗涤材料的情况下,对生物质进行压榨,并结合不洗涤材料对两步稀酸水解后获得的糖产率的影响,以及随后对固体进行酶解的情况。
在两步酸水解步骤之间洗涤材料,然后进行酶解,无论选择哪种脱水方法(压榨或真空过滤),均可回收液体部分中 96%的甘露糖和 81%的葡萄糖(理论值的%)。在两步酸水解步骤之间不洗涤固体,会导致第二水解步骤中剩余固体的酸度升高,从而导致压榨和真空过滤的浆料的甘露糖产率分别降低至理论值的 85%和 74%,这是由于糖降解所致。然而,这种酸度的增加导致压榨浆料的葡萄糖产率(94.2%)高于过滤浆料(77.6%)。
在两步酸水解步骤之间压榨洗涤后的物料对第二酸水解步骤和酶解的糖产率没有显著的负面影响。不洗涤物料会导致第二酸水解步骤更加苛刻,从而导致在随后的固体酸水解过程中糖的降解更大,特别是对于真空过滤的固体。然而,在两步之间不洗涤物料的情况下进行压榨,可以提高酶解步骤的糖产率。因此,建议在两步酸水解阶段之间尽可能将未经洗涤的浆料压榨至尽可能高的干物质含量,以实现高的最终糖产率。