Prelipceanu D
Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie "Carol Davila" Bucureşti, Facultatea de Medicină.
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2006 Jan-Mar;110(1):11-7.
The author makes an overview of the latest theoretical developments and of the critical views on the current classification of personality disorders. The major topics of the ongoing debate over the typology of personality disorders as presented by DSM-IV-TR are listed as the difficulties that remain in clarifying the clinical criteria, despite the clinical assessment tools and the self-assessment questionnaires that are usually employed in research. The solution to the dilemma categorical vs. dimensional in personality disorders taxonomy, as suggested by some current authors in dimensionally quantifying the diagnosis criteria for the classic types of personality disorders has received much attention. But the relevant practical solutions need more longitudinal future studies done on a congruent agenda.
作者概述了人格障碍最新的理论发展以及对当前人格障碍分类的批判性观点。美国精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)中提出的关于人格障碍类型学的持续辩论的主要议题被列为,尽管在研究中通常会使用临床评估工具和自我评估问卷,但在明确临床标准方面仍然存在困难。一些当代作者建议在对经典人格障碍类型的诊断标准进行维度量化时解决人格障碍分类学中类别与维度的两难困境,这一建议受到了广泛关注。但相关的实际解决方案需要在一个一致的议程上进行更多的纵向研究。