Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):354-61. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577473.
Advances in personality assessment over the past 20 years have notably influenced the proposed assessment and classification of personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. [DSM-5]). However, a considerable body of personality assessment and psychodynamically oriented assessment research has significant relevance to the way in which personality disorders are evaluated that appears to have gone unrecognized in the current proposals for DSM-5. In this article, I discuss the ways in which some of these 2 bodies of literature can and should inform the DSM-5 so that the diagnostic nomenclature can be more scientifically and comprehensively informed and consequently improve the clinical utility of a diagnostic system in need of considerable revision.
在过去的 20 年中，人格评估领域的进展显著影响了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（第五版[DSM-5]）中人格障碍的评估和分类建议。然而，大量人格评估和精神分析导向评估研究与人格障碍的评估方式密切相关，但在 DSM-5 的现行建议中似乎并未得到重视。在本文中，我将讨论这两部分文献如何能够并且应该为 DSM-5 提供信息，以便使诊断命名法能够更加科学和全面地得到信息支持，从而提高一个需要进行重大修订的诊断系统的临床实用性。
