Catalano Louis, Horne Landon T, Fischer Evan, Barron O Alton, Glickel Steven Z
CV Starr Hand Surgery Center, 1000 Tenth Ave, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Orthopedics. 2008 Mar;31(3):228. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080301-07.
This study compared patients with basal joint arthritis who underwent either ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) or trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty (TMIA). Twenty-two consecutive LRTI and 22 TMIA procedures were compared. Arthritis was graded using the staging system of Eaton. In the LRTI group, 1 patient (4.5%) had stage II, 3 patients (13.6%) had stage III, and 14 patients (15 LRTI procedures; 68.1%) had stage IV disease; 3 patients had previous silicone implants (13.6%). In the TMIA group, 3 patients (13.6%) had stage II and 19 patients (86.4%) had stage III disease. Mean age was 62.5 years in LRTI patients and 54.7 years in TMIA patients (P=.005). Mean follow-up was 48 months for both groups. Thumb shortening was determined using preoperative lateral and follow-up pinch lateral radiographs. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Pinch strength averaged 8.1 lb for LRTI and 12.6 lbs for TMIA patients; this difference was significant (P<.002). Patients in both groups had high overall satisfaction rates, with scores averaging 8.5 for LRTI patients and 9.2 for TMIA patients. Thumb metacarpal proximal migration was 20.5% in the LRTI group, and 6.5% in the TMIA group; this difference was significant (P=.0006). There was no statistically significant linear correlation between proximal migration and pinch strength (R=0.32, P=.13). Five TMIA patients required revision to LRTI. Patients in both groups reported high satisfaction. Pinch strength was greater in TMIA patients, and proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal was greater in LRTI patients. There was no correlation between proximal metacarpal migration and pinch strength. Increased pinch strength with TMIA may not be sufficiently advantageous to outweigh the risk for revision surgery.
本研究比较了接受韧带重建肌腱植入术(LRTI)或大多角骨-第一掌骨间植入关节成形术(TMIA)的基底关节关节炎患者。比较了连续进行的22例LRTI手术和22例TMIA手术。使用伊顿分期系统对关节炎进行分级。在LRTI组中,1例患者(4.5%)为II期,3例患者(13.6%)为III期,14例患者(15例LRTI手术;68.1%)为IV期疾病;3例患者曾植入硅胶假体(13.6%)。在TMIA组中,3例患者(13.6%)为II期,19例患者(86.4%)为III期疾病。LRTI组患者的平均年龄为62.5岁,TMIA组患者的平均年龄为54.7岁(P = 0.005)。两组的平均随访时间均为48个月。使用术前侧位片和随访捏持侧位片确定拇指缩短情况。分析功能结果和患者满意度。LRTI患者的捏力平均为8.1磅,TMIA患者的捏力平均为12.6磅;这一差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.002)。两组患者的总体满意度都很高,LRTI组患者的评分平均为8.5分,TMIA组患者的评分平均为9.2分。LRTI组拇指掌骨近端移位率为20.5%,TMIA组为6.5%;这一差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0006)。近端移位与捏力之间无统计学显著线性相关性(R = 0.32,P = 0.13)。5例TMIA患者需要翻修为LRTI。两组患者均报告高度满意。TMIA患者的捏力更大,LRTI患者拇指掌骨的近端移位更大。掌骨近端移位与捏力之间无相关性。TMIA增加的捏力可能不足以带来足够的优势以超过翻修手术的风险。