• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不切实际的乐观情绪:不同方法测量糖尿病易感性的影响

Assessing unrealistic optimism: impact of different approaches to measuring susceptibility to diabetes.

作者信息

Hevey David, French David P, Marteau Theresa M, Sutton Stephen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2009 Apr;14(3):372-7. doi: 10.1177/1359105308101675.

DOI:10.1177/1359105308101675
PMID:19293298
Abstract

The effects of measurement method on levels of unrealistic optimism for developing diabetes were examined in 323 UK adults. A mixed factorial design comprised direct and indirect measures of unrealistic optimism as the within-subjects variable, and between-subjects manipulations of the order of direct versus indirect assessment, the order of self-other comparison, the number of response options used and the polarity of the ratings. More unrealistic optimism was obtained using the direct method and using unipolar scales, and/or with the self-other order in the indirect method. The results indicate that levels of unrealistic optimism depend on its assessment method.

摘要

在323名英国成年人中研究了测量方法对患糖尿病不切实际乐观水平的影响。混合因子设计包括将不切实际乐观的直接和间接测量作为被试内变量,以及被试间对直接与间接评估顺序、自我与他人比较顺序、使用的反应选项数量和评分极性的操纵。使用直接方法、单极量表和/或间接方法中的自我与他人顺序时,获得了更多不切实际的乐观情绪。结果表明,不切实际乐观水平取决于其评估方法。

相似文献

1
Assessing unrealistic optimism: impact of different approaches to measuring susceptibility to diabetes.评估不切实际的乐观情绪:不同方法测量糖尿病易感性的影响
J Health Psychol. 2009 Apr;14(3):372-7. doi: 10.1177/1359105308101675.
2
What do people think about when answering questionnaires to assess unrealistic optimism about skin cancer? A think aloud study.人们在回答用于评估对皮肤癌的不现实乐观态度的问卷时会想到什么?一项出声思考研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2008 Jan;13(1):63-74. doi: 10.1080/13548500701243959.
3
Cultural differences in unrealistic optimism and pessimism: the role of egocentrism and direct versus indirect comparison measures.不切实际的乐观主义和悲观主义中的文化差异:自我中心主义以及直接与间接比较测量方法的作用
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;34(9):1236-48. doi: 10.1177/0146167208319764. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
4
Optimism and adaptation to chronic disease: The role of optimism in relation to self-care options of type 1 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.乐观主义与慢性病适应:乐观主义在1型糖尿病、类风湿性关节炎和多发性硬化症自我护理选择方面的作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2002 Nov;7(Part 4):409-432. doi: 10.1348/135910702320645390.
5
Are people unrealistically optimistic? It depends how you ask them.人们是否过于乐观?这取决于你如何询问他们。
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Feb;9(Pt 1):39-49. doi: 10.1348/135910704322778713.
6
The link between judgments of comparative risk and own risk: further evidence.比较风险判断与自身风险之间的联系:进一步的证据。
Psychol Health Med. 2007 Mar;12(2):238-47. doi: 10.1080/13548500600568183.
7
When and why people are comparatively optimistic about future health risks: The role of direct and indirect comparison measures.人们何时以及为何对未来健康风险持相对乐观态度:直接和间接比较措施的作用。
Psychol Health Med. 2011 Aug;16(4):475-83. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.555772.
8
Inversion of the "unrealistic optimism" bias contributes to overestimation of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder.“不现实的乐观主义”偏差的反转导致强迫症中对威胁的高估。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Mar;37(2):179-93. doi: 10.1017/S1352465808005043.
9
Comparison of three established measures of fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults: psychometric testing.社区居住老年人中三种既定的跌倒恐惧测量方法的比较:心理测量测试
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
10
Unrealistic optimism and event threat.不切实际的乐观主义与事件威胁。
Psychol Health Med. 2008 Mar;13(2):193-201. doi: 10.1080/13548500701426745.

引用本文的文献

1
Do JUUL and e-cigarette flavours change risk perceptions of adolescents? Evidence from a national survey.电子烟口味是否会改变青少年对风险的认知?一项全国性调查的证据。
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):199-205. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055394. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.综合考虑,我患糖尿病的风险处于中等水平:2 型糖尿病家族风险的风险个体化过程。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):169-181. doi: 10.1111/hex.12986. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
A Longitudinal Study of Adolescents' Optimistic Bias about Risks and Benefits of Cigarette Smoking.
一项关于青少年对吸烟风险和益处的乐观偏差的纵向研究。
Am J Health Behav. 2016 May;40(3):341-51. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.3.6.
4
I Eat Healthier Than You: Differences in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Choices for Oneself and for Others.我比你吃得更健康:为自己和他人选择健康与不健康食物的差异。
Nutrients. 2015 Jun 9;7(6):4638-60. doi: 10.3390/nu7064638.