Tate Angela R, McClure Philip, Kareha Stephen, Irwin Dominic, Barbe Mary F
H/S Therapy Associates, Inc, Lower Gwynedd, PA, USA.
J Athl Train. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):165-73. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.165.
Although clinical methods for detecting scapular dyskinesis have been described, evidence supporting the validity of these methods is lacking.
To determine the validity of the scapular dyskinesis test, a visually based method of identifying abnormal scapular motion. A secondary purpose was to explore the relationship between scapular dyskinesis and shoulder symptoms.
Validation study comparing 3-dimensional measures of scapular motion among participants clinically judged as having either normal motion or scapular dyskinesis.
University athletic training facilities.
A sample of 142 collegiate athletes (National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and Division III) participating in sports requiring overhead use of the arm was rated, and 66 of these underwent 3-dimensional testing.
INTERVENTION(S): Volunteers were viewed by 2 raters while performing weighted shoulder flexion and abduction. The right and left sides were rated independently as normal, subtle dyskinesis, or obvious dyskinesis using the scapular dyskinesis test. Symptoms were assessed using the Penn Shoulder Score.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Athletes judged as having either normal motion or obvious dyskinesis underwent 3-dimensional electromagnetic kinematic testing while performing the same movements. The kinematic data from both groups were compared via multifactor analysis of variance with post hoc testing using the least significant difference procedure. The relationship between symptoms and scapular dyskinesis was evaluated by odds ratios.
Differences were found between the normal and obvious dyskinesis groups. Participants with obvious dyskinesis showed less scapular upward rotation (P < .001), less clavicular elevation (P < .001), and greater clavicular protraction (P = .044). The presence of shoulder symptoms was not different between the normal and obvious dyskinesis volunteers (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.33, 1.89).
Shoulders visually judged as having dyskinesis showed distinct alterations in 3-dimensional scapular motion. However, the presence of scapular dyskinesis was not related to shoulder symptoms in athletes engaged in overhead sports.
尽管已经描述了检测肩胛运动障碍的临床方法,但缺乏支持这些方法有效性的证据。
确定肩胛运动障碍测试的有效性,这是一种基于视觉识别异常肩胛运动的方法。第二个目的是探讨肩胛运动障碍与肩部症状之间的关系。
一项验证性研究,比较临床判断为肩胛运动正常或存在肩胛运动障碍的参与者之间肩胛运动的三维测量结果。
大学体育训练设施。
对142名参加需要上肢过顶运动的大学运动员(美国国家大学体育协会第一分区和第三分区)进行评级,其中66人接受了三维测试。
两名评估者在志愿者进行负重肩部屈曲和外展时对其进行观察。使用肩胛运动障碍测试将左右两侧独立评定为正常、轻微运动障碍或明显运动障碍。使用宾夕法尼亚肩部评分评估症状。
被判断为肩胛运动正常或明显运动障碍的运动员在进行相同动作时接受三维电磁运动学测试。通过多因素方差分析及使用最小显著差异法的事后检验比较两组的运动学数据。通过优势比评估症状与肩胛运动障碍之间的关系。
正常组和明显运动障碍组之间存在差异。明显运动障碍的参与者肩胛上旋较少(P < 0.001),锁骨抬高较少(P < 0.001),锁骨前伸较多(P = 0.044)。正常和明显运动障碍的志愿者之间肩部症状的存在没有差异(优势比 = 0.79,95%置信区间 = [0.33, 1.89])。
视觉上判断为存在运动障碍的肩部在三维肩胛运动中表现出明显改变。然而,在从事上肢过顶运动的运动员中,肩胛运动障碍的存在与肩部症状无关。