Lillioja S, Wilton A
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Diabetologia. 2009 Jun;52(6):1061-74. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1324-9. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Little of the genetic basis for type 2 diabetes has been explained, despite numerous genetic linkage studies and the discovery of multiple genes in genome-wide association (GWA) studies. To begin to resolve the genetic component of this disease, we searched for sites at which genetic results had been corroborated in different studies, in the expectation that replication among studies should direct us to the genomic locations of causative genes with more confidence than the results of individual studies.
We have mapped the physical location of results from 83 linkage reports (for type 2 diabetes and diabetes precursor quantitative traits [QTs, e.g. plasma insulin levels]) and recent large GWA reports (for type 2 diabetes) onto the same human genome sequence to identify replicated results in diabetes genetic 'hot spots'.
Genetic linkage has been found at least ten times at 18 different locations, and at least five times in 56 locations. All replication clusters contained study populations from more than one ethnic background and most contained results for both diabetes and QTs. There is no close relationship between the GWA results and linkage clusters, and the nine best replication clusters have no nearby GWA result.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Many of the genes for type 2 diabetes remain unidentified. This analysis identifies the broad location of yet to be identified genes on 6q, 1q, 18p, 2q, 20q, 17pq, 8p, 19q and 9q. The discrepancy between the linkage and GWA studies may be explained by the presence of multiple, uncommon, mildly deleterious polymorphisms scattered throughout the regulatory and coding regions of genes for type 2 diabetes.
目的/假设:尽管进行了大量的基因连锁研究并在全基因组关联(GWA)研究中发现了多个基因,但2型糖尿病的遗传基础仍未得到充分解释。为了开始解析这种疾病的遗传成分,我们寻找了在不同研究中得到证实的基因位点,期望研究之间的重复验证能比单个研究的结果更可靠地指引我们找到致病基因的基因组位置。
我们已将83篇连锁报告(针对2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期定量性状[QT,例如血浆胰岛素水平])以及近期大型GWA报告(针对2型糖尿病)的结果物理定位到同一人类基因组序列上,以识别糖尿病遗传“热点”中的重复结果。
在18个不同位置至少发现了10次遗传连锁,在56个位置至少发现了5次。所有重复聚类均包含来自多个种族背景的研究人群,且大多数包含糖尿病和QT的结果。GWA结果与连锁聚类之间没有密切关系,九个最佳重复聚类附近没有GWA结果。
结论/解读:许多2型糖尿病相关基因仍未被识别。该分析确定了6q、1q、18p、2q、20q、17pq、8p、19q和9q上尚未识别基因的大致位置。连锁研究与GWA研究之间的差异可能是由于2型糖尿病相关基因的调控和编码区域散布着多个罕见的轻度有害多态性。