Frank E, Prien R F, Jarrett R B, Keller M B, Kupfer D J, Lavori P W, Rush A J, Weissman M M
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;48(9):851-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330075011.
In 1988, the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on the Psychobiology of Depression convened a task force to examine the ways in which change points in the course of depressive illness had been described and the extent to which inconsistency in these descriptions might be impeding research on this disorder. We found considerable inconsistency across and even within research reports and concluded that research on depressive illness would be well served by greater consistency in the definition change points in the course of illness. We propose an internally consistent, empirically defined conceptual scheme for the terms remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. In addition, we propose tentative operational criteria for each term. Finally, we discuss ways to assess the usefulness of such operational criteria through reanalysis of existing data and the design and conduct of new experiments.
1988年,麦克阿瑟基金会抑郁症心理生物学研究网络召集了一个特别工作组,以研究抑郁症病程中转折点的描述方式,以及这些描述中的不一致在多大程度上可能阻碍对该疾病的研究。我们发现,研究报告之间甚至内部都存在相当大的不一致,并得出结论,抑郁症研究若能在疾病病程中定义转折点时更加一致,将大有裨益。我们为缓解、康复、复发和再发这些术语提出了一个内部一致、基于实证定义的概念框架。此外,我们还为每个术语提出了暂定的操作标准。最后,我们讨论了通过重新分析现有数据以及设计和开展新实验来评估此类操作标准实用性的方法。