Davidoff G N, Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P
Department of PM&R, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;72(11):869-73. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90001-y.
The efficacy of rehabilitation programs to facilitate recovery after acute stroke remains controversial. To further evaluate this issue, the records of 139 "middle-band" stroke survivors were reviewed retrospectively at admission to, discharge from, and one-year follow-up from inpatient rehabilitation. Patients were divided into two groups (out-patient [O/P] or no O/P) based on their involvement in physical and occupational therapy services. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated that both groups made clinically and statistically significant improvements in all functional indices between stroke onset, discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, and follow-up: O/P therapy: mobility F(1,46) = 1651, p less than .0001; self-care F(1,47) = 1062, p less than .0001; total F (1,47) = 1093, p less than .0001; no O/P therapy: mobility F(91,88) = 5643, p less than .0001; self-care F(1,88) = 5722, p less than .0001; total F(1,88) = 6733, p less than .0001. Pairwise comparisons for all functional indices revealed that all statistically significant changes in function in the no O/P therapy group occurred between stroke onset and discharge: self-care (p less than .0001), mobility (p less than .0001), and total (p less than .0001). Pairwise comparisons of all indices in the O/P therapy group revealed that all differences between stroke onset and discharge functional scores were at the p less than .0001 level, and score differences between discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and follow-up were as follows: self-care (p less than .05), mobility (p less than .001), and total (p less than .005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
康复计划对促进急性中风后恢复的疗效仍存在争议。为进一步评估这一问题,我们回顾性分析了139名“中等病情程度”中风幸存者在住院康复入院时、出院时及出院后一年随访时的记录。根据患者接受物理和职业治疗服务的情况将其分为两组(门诊治疗组或非门诊治疗组)。重复测量方差分析表明,两组在中风发作、住院康复出院及随访之间的所有功能指标上均取得了具有临床意义和统计学意义的改善:门诊治疗组:活动能力F(1,46) = 1651,p <.0001;自我护理F(1,47) = 1062,p <.0001;综合F(1,47) = 1093,p <.0001;非门诊治疗组:活动能力F(91,88) = 5643,p <.0001;自我护理F(1,88) = 5722,p <.0001;综合F(1,88) = 6733,p <.0001。所有功能指标的两两比较显示,非门诊治疗组所有功能上具有统计学意义的变化均发生在中风发作至出院之间:自我护理(p <.0001)、活动能力(p <.0001)和综合(p <.0001)。门诊治疗组所有指标的两两比较显示,中风发作与出院功能评分之间的所有差异均处于p <.0001水平,住院康复出院与随访之间的评分差异如下:自我护理(p <.05)、活动能力(p <.001)和综合(p <.005)。(摘要截断于250字)