Suppr超能文献

健康受试者和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸气速度和吸气末停顿对用力呼气操作的影响。

Effect of preceding inspiratory speed and end-inspiratory pause on forced expiratory manoeuvre in healthy subjects and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, and 1st Medicina, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Respiration. 2009;78(3):270-7. doi: 10.1159/000209741. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) have been consistently found after slow inspiration with end-inspiratory pause (EIP).

OBJECTIVES

It was the aim of this study to establish the respective influence of the speed of preceding inspiration (SPI) and EIP on the parameters obtained from the following expiratory forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre.

METHODS

In 8 healthy subjects and 12 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a number of inspirations with different SPI and EIP were performed. In the subsequent FVC manoeuvre, maximal expiratory flows, including PEF, and maximal expired volumes at different times, including FEV(1), were measured. For each FVC manoeuvre, peak expiratory time, expired volume at PEF (as % of FVC), flow limitation by the negative expiratory pressure technique and FVC were checked to be sure of achieving a similar expiratory effort and starting inflation lung volume.

RESULTS

The highest values of PEF and FEV(1) were found in normal subjects and COPD patients after fastest SPI without EIP (p < 0.001). In normal subjects, no significant PEF and FEV(1) changes during FVC manoeuvre were observed with different SPI, in the absence of EIP. In contrast, inspirations with slower SPI (inspiratory time >2 s) without EIP were followed by lower PEF in COPD patients (p < 0.05). As compared with inspirations without EIP, those with a presence of EIP were invariably followed by lower PEF and FEV(1), both in normal subjects and in COPD patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of SPI on subsequent PEF and FEV(1) is irrelevant in healthy subjects as well as in COPD patients, unless SPI is too slow (inspiratory time >2 s), while any EIP decreases these indices in all individuals.

摘要

背景

在进行慢吸气并在吸气末停顿(EIP)后,通常会发现呼气峰流速(PEF)和 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)降低。

目的

本研究旨在确定在后续用力呼气肺活量(FVC)操作中,前置吸气速度(SPI)和 EIP 各自对参数的影响。

方法

在 8 名健康受试者和 12 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,进行了不同 SPI 和 EIP 的多次吸气。在随后的 FVC 操作中,测量了最大呼气流量,包括 PEF,以及不同时间的最大呼气量,包括 FEV1。对于每个 FVC 操作,检查呼气峰时间、PEF 时的呼气量(占 FVC 的百分比)、通过负呼气压力技术的流量限制以及 FVC,以确保达到相似的呼气努力和起始充气肺容积。

结果

在没有 EIP 的最快 SPI 后,正常受试者和 COPD 患者的 PEF 和 FEV1 值最高(p<0.001)。在正常受试者中,在没有 EIP 的情况下,不同 SPI 下的 FVC 操作中,PEF 和 FEV1 没有明显变化。相比之下,在没有 EIP 的情况下,较慢 SPI(吸气时间>2 秒)的吸气后 COPD 患者的 PEF 降低(p<0.05)。与没有 EIP 的吸气相比,在正常受试者和 COPD 患者中,EIP 的存在总是会导致较低的 PEF 和 FEV1(p<0.05)。

结论

在健康受试者和 COPD 患者中,SPI 对随后的 PEF 和 FEV1 的影响是无关的,除非 SPI 太慢(吸气时间>2 秒),而任何 EIP 都会降低所有人的这些指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验